These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
660 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26887873)
41. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome. Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers. Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of the laparoscopic versus conventional open method for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Chu LH; Chang WC; Sheu BC Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 55(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 27125400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Quality of life in patients affected by endometrial cancer: comparison among laparotomy, laparoscopy and vaginal approach. Berretta R; Gizzo S; Noventa M; Marrazzo V; Franchi L; Migliavacca C; Michela M; Merisio C; Modena AB; Patrelli TS Pathol Oncol Res; 2015 Jul; 21(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 25573595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Comparative analysis of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer]. Peng P; Huang HF; Shen K; Pan LY; Wu M; Yang JX; Lang JH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 15130375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma]. Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [A retrospective controlled clinical study of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer]. Li GX; Li JM; Wang YN; Deng HJ; Mou TY; Liu H Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):515-520. PubMed ID: 28655080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of reoperation rates, perioperative outcomes in women with endometrial cancer when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to laparoscopy. Boosz A; Haeberle L; Renner SP; Thiel FC; Mehlhorn G; Beckmann MW; Mueller A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1215-20. PubMed ID: 25009071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Adoption of Single-port Laparoscopy for Full Staging of Endometrial Cancer: Surgical and Oncology Outcomes and Evaluation of the Learning Curve. Barnes H; Harrison R; Huffman L; Medlin E; Spencer R; Al-Niaimi A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 28662990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in patients with stage I and II endometrial cancer. Kim DY; Kim MK; Kim JH; Suh DS; Kim YM; Kim YT; Mok JE; Nam JH Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(5):932-7. PubMed ID: 16174248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Analysis of survival after laparoscopy in women with endometrial carcinoma. Eltabbakh GH Cancer; 2002 Nov; 95(9):1894-901. PubMed ID: 12404283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgical staging for early-stage endometrial cancer. Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Nam JH Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 24407582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis]. Li XM; Wang J Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28355689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review. He H; Zeng D; Ou H; Tang Y; Li J; Zhong H J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 23506718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of the results of surgical treatment using laparoscopy and laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer. Sobiczewski P; Bidzinski M; Derlatka P; Dańska-Bidzińska A; Gmyrek J; Panek G Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(5):946-51. PubMed ID: 16174250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic Yang ZF; Wu DQ; Wang JJ; Lv ZJ; Li Y World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 24(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 29358884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]