BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26887892)

  • 1. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.
    Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London's responsible officers and their appraisers.
    Griffin A; Furmedge DS; Gill D; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Noble L; Field R; Ingham Clark C
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 15():152. PubMed ID: 26392086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audit of annual medical appraisal and revalidation activity across the UK Defence Medical Services 2013-2014.
    Morris LE; Withnall R
    J R Army Med Corps; 2017 Feb; 163(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 26759502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The United Kingdom's experience with and future plans for revalidation.
    Archer J; de Bere SR
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33 Suppl 1():S48-53. PubMed ID: 24347152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.
    Davies H; Khera N; Stroobant J
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15665172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Cameron N
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing medical revalidation in the United Kingdom: Findings about organisational changes and impacts from a survey of Responsible Officers.
    Walshe K; Boyd A; Bryce M; Luscombe K; Tazzyman A; Tredinnick-Rowe J; Archer J
    J R Soc Med; 2017 Jan; 110(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28084166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revalidation - a personal reflection.
    Dawda P
    Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Nov; 42(11):826-8. PubMed ID: 24217109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice.
    Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL
    Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reflective Practice for Patient Benefit: An Analysis of Doctors' Appraisal Portfolios in Scotland.
    Wakeling J; Holmes S; Boyd A; Tredinnick-Rowe J; Cameron N; Marshall M; Bryce M; Archer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2019; 39(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 30730475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revalidation is not to be feared and can be achieved by continuous objective assessment.
    Bolsin SN; Cawson E; Colson ME
    Med J Aust; 2015 Aug; 203(3):142-4, 144e.1. PubMed ID: 26224185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals?
    Coomber J; Charlton R; Thistlethwaite JE; England L
    BMC Fam Pract; 2012 Dec; 13():123. PubMed ID: 23253694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competence assurance - who cares?
    Youngson GG
    J Pediatr Surg; 2014 Feb; 49(2):241-3. PubMed ID: 24528958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The McDonaldization of appraisal? Doctors' views of the early impacts of medical revalidation in the United Kingdom.
    Archer J; Nunn S; Regan de Bere S
    Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):994-1000. PubMed ID: 28756852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary codesign and testing of a feedback tool to improve the quality of peer appraiser documentation for medical revalidation.
    Murie J; MacWalter G; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2019 Jan; 30(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 30376417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
    Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revalidation, appraisal and multisource feedback for occupational physicians.
    Nimmo S
    Occup Med (Lond); 2017 Aug; 67(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 28898972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.
    Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.