274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26888932)
21. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.
Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spectrally specific temporal analyses of spike-train responses to complex sounds: A unifying framework.
Parida S; Bharadwaj H; Heinz MG
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1008155. PubMed ID: 33617548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modeling temporal information encoding by the population of fibers in the healthy and synaptopathic auditory nerve.
Johannesen PT; Leclère T; Wijetillake A; Segovia-Martínez M; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108621. PubMed ID: 36182814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Underlying neural mechanisms of degraded speech intelligibility following noise-induced hearing loss: The importance of distorted tonotopy.
Parida S; Heinz MG
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108586. PubMed ID: 35953357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Temporal Fine Structure of Background Noise Determines the Benefit of Bimodal Hearing for Recognizing Speech.
Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 21(6):527-544. PubMed ID: 33104927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Primary Neural Degeneration in Noise-Exposed Human Cochleas: Correlations with Outer Hair Cell Loss and Word-Discrimination Scores.
Wu PZ; O'Malley JT; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC
J Neurosci; 2021 May; 41(20):4439-4447. PubMed ID: 33883202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Regeneration after tall hair cell damage following severe acoustic trauma in adult pigeons: correlation between cochlear morphology, compound action potential responses and single fiber properties in single animals.
Müller M; Smolders JW; Ding-Pfennigdorff D; Klinke R
Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):133-54. PubMed ID: 8951458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimal combination of neural temporal envelope and fine structure cues to explain speech identification in background noise.
Moon IJ; Won JH; Park MH; Ives DT; Nie K; Heinz MG; Lorenzi C; Rubinstein JT
J Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 34(36):12145-54. PubMed ID: 25186758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Phase-locked responses to tones of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers: implications for apical cochlear mechanics.
Temchin AN; Ruggero MA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):297-318. PubMed ID: 19921334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Neural correlates of sensorineural hearing loss.
Salvi RJ; Henderson D; Hamernik R; Ahroon WA
Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 6345246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Wiener-kernel analysis of responses to noise of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers.
Recio-Spinoso A; Temchin AN; van Dijk P; Fan YH; Ruggero MA
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3615-34. PubMed ID: 15659532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.
Carney LH
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 19(4):331-352. PubMed ID: 29744729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dual Coding of Frequency Modulation in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.
Paraouty N; Stasiak A; Lorenzi C; Varnet L; Winter IM
J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(17):4123-4137. PubMed ID: 29599389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Auditory brainstem responses predict auditory nerve fiber thresholds and frequency selectivity in hearing impaired chinchillas.
Henry KS; Kale S; Scheidt RE; Heinz MG
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):236-44. PubMed ID: 21699970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.
Wirtzfeld MR; Ibrahim RA; Bruce IC
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 18(5):687-710. PubMed ID: 28748487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The immediate effects of acoustic trauma on excitation and inhibition in the inferior colliculus: A Wiener-kernel analysis.
Heeringa AN; van Dijk P
Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():47-56. PubMed ID: 26523371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
