95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26889494)
21. Reply to S.C. Adams et al, C. Lopez et al, and R.U. Newton et al.
Hardcastle SJ; Cohen PA
J Clin Oncol; 2018 Mar; 36(9):928-930. PubMed ID: 29373095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Comments to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9) and the reply to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9).
Edwards KL
Eur Spine J; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2889-2890. PubMed ID: 30327911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Testing the Storm et al. (2010) meta-analysis using Bayesian and frequentist approaches: reply to Rouder et al. (2013).
Storm L; Tressoldi PE; Utts J
Psychol Bull; 2013 Jan; 139(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 23294093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reply to V.P. Retèl et al, D. Gauchan et al, and C. Rahilly-Tierney et al.
Bonastre J; Marguet S; Lueza B; Michiels S; Delaloge S; Saghatchian M
J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 33(14):1629-30. PubMed ID: 25847933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Still no evidence that risk-taking and consumer choices can be primed by mating motives: Reply to Sundie, Beal, Neuberg, and Kenrick (2019).
Shanks DR; Vadillo MA
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Apr; 148(4):e12-e22. PubMed ID: 30973267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reply to I.F. Tannock, P. Isaacsson Velho et al, M. Tiako Meyo et al, and F.J.S.H. Woei-A-Jin et al.
Szmulewitz RZ; Stadler WM; Ratain MJ
J Clin Oncol; 2018 Oct; 36(30):3064-3065. PubMed ID: 30188784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reply to U. Ravnskov et al, D. Tural et al, and M.A.N. Şendur et al.
Cardwell CR; Hicks BM; Hughes C; Murray LJ
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(7):812. PubMed ID: 25605854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Reply to s. Bonovas et Al, s. Clement et Al, and j.L. Lund et Al.
Tsan YT; Lee CS; Ho WC; Lin MH; Wang JD; Chen PC
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(32):4162-4. PubMed ID: 24081943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reply to P.G. Tsoutsou et al, o. Kaidar-Person et al, and A. Courdi et al.
Hughes KS; Schnaper LA; Bellon JR; Cirrincione CT; Berry DA; McCormick B; Muss HB; Smith BL; Hudis CA; Winer EP; Wood WC
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(36):4571-3. PubMed ID: 24190113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Reviewer's comment to Letter to the Editor of Jingming Lin et al. concerning "Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis" (by W. Ding et al. (2014) Eur Spine J 23(2):395-403): and authors' reply of Wenbin Ding et al.
Edwards K
Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2357. PubMed ID: 26206291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reply to three letters: Dubravcsik et al, Murion et al and Fan et al The horse must come before the cart ….
Kerdsirichairat T; Arain M; Freeman M
Endoscopy; 2015 May; 47(5):470-1. PubMed ID: 25910012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comment on Tachibana's reply to Buelke-Sam et al., Springer et al., and Gaylor regarding reply to: comments on "Behavioral teratogenic effect of methylmercury and d-amphetamine: meta-analysis and power analysis of data from the Collaborative Behavioral Teratology Study of National Center for Toxicological Research.
Vorhees CV
Teratology; 1991 Mar; 43(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 1826570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010).
Klauer KC; Kellen D
Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 21244192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In Reply to Nasmith et al and to Tassone et al.
Paradis E; Whitehead CR
Acad Med; 2018 Dec; 93(12):1751-1752. PubMed ID: 30489300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reply to Westerveld et al. and Schembri et al.
Zeki SS; Ooi J; Wilson P; Walker G; Blaker P; DeMartino S; O'Donohue J; Reffitt D; Lanaspre E; Chang F; Meenan J; Dunn JM
Endoscopy; 2017 Nov; 49(11):1115. PubMed ID: 29073698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reply to T. Seisen et al and P. Ghadjar et al.
Tendulkar RD; Agrawal S; Pisansky TM
J Clin Oncol; 2017 May; 35(13):1491-1492. PubMed ID: 28135134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Reply to H.J.A. Adams et al and E. Laffon et al.
Meignan M; Cottereau AS; Versari A; Chartier L; Dupuis J; Boussetta S; Grassi I; Casasnovas RO; Haioun C; Tilly H; Tarantino V; Dubreuil J; Federico M; Salles G; Luminari S; Trotman J
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Mar; 35(8):920-923. PubMed ID: 28029310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. In Reply to Robison et al and White et al.
Berman NB; Durning SJ; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S; Triola MM
Acad Med; 2017 Jan; 92(1):10. PubMed ID: 28027093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In Reply to Ruddy et al, to Gumbert et al, and to Stoddard.
Prober CG; Kolars JC
Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11):1470. PubMed ID: 27779524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reply to E.C. Harrold et al and A.O. Ayoola et al.
van Hazel GA; Gibbs P
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 34(34):4194-4195. PubMed ID: 27621391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
