These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26889684)

  • 1. Mentally simulating narrative perspective is not universal or necessary for language comprehension.
    Brunyé TT; Ditman T; Giles GE; Holmes A; Taylor HA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1592-1605. PubMed ID: 26889684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When you and I share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension.
    Brunyé TT; Ditman T; Mahoney CR; Augustyn JS; Taylor HA
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 19076318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulating an enactment effect: Pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension.
    Ditman T; Brunyé TT; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 19939357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The case of the missing pronouns: does mentally simulated perspective play a functional role in the comprehension of person?
    Sato M; Bergen BK
    Cognition; 2013 Jun; 127(3):361-74. PubMed ID: 23545386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readers select a comprehension mode independent of pronoun: Evidence from fMRI during narrative comprehension.
    Hartung F; Hagoort P; Willems RM
    Brain Lang; 2017 Jul; 170():29-38. PubMed ID: 28391032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. You heard it here first: readers mentally simulate described sounds.
    Brunyé TT; Ditman T; Mahoney CR; Walters EK; Taylor HA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 20621285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive empathy modulates the processing of pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehension.
    Li S; Jiang X; Yu H; Zhou X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1166-74. PubMed ID: 23893849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embodied Simulations Are Modulated by Sentential Perspective.
    van Dam WO; Desai RH
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Aug; 41(6):1613-1628. PubMed ID: 27859508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes Over Time in the Comprehension of He and They as Epicene Pronouns.
    Noll J; Lowry M; Bryant J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Oct; 47(5):1057-1068. PubMed ID: 29549477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in children's pronoun processing during reading: Detection of incongruence is associated with higher reading fluency and more regressions.
    Eilers S; Tiffin-Richards SP; Schroeder S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Sep; 173():250-267. PubMed ID: 29753908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading.
    Hartung F; Burke M; Hagoort P; Willems RM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154732. PubMed ID: 27192060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: evidence for delay.
    Stewart AJ; Holler J; Kidd E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1680-96. PubMed ID: 17853228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequential Coherence in Sentence Pairs Enhances Imagery during Comprehension: An Individual Differences Study.
    Madden-Lombardi C; Jouen AL; Dominey PF; Ventre-Dominey J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138269. PubMed ID: 26383115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in spatial cognition influence mental simulation of language.
    Vukovic N; Williams JN
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():110-22. PubMed ID: 26036923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracking and maintenance of goal-relevant location information in narratives.
    Levine WH; Kim JE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):983-996. PubMed ID: 30859405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who do you refer to? How young students with mild intellectual disability confront anaphoric ambiguities in texts and sentences.
    Tavares G; Fajardo I; Ávila V; Salmerón L; Ferrer A
    Res Dev Disabil; 2015 Mar; 38():108-24. PubMed ID: 25556895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Good reasons for bad behavior: a randomized controlled experiment on the impact of narrative reading and writing on empathic concern, perspective-taking, and attitude.
    Bientzle M; Eggeling M; Kimmerle J
    Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1343225. PubMed ID: 38645444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracking your emotions: An eye-tracking study on reader's engagement with perspective during text comprehension.
    Child S; Oakhill J; Garnham A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):929-940. PubMed ID: 31986983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event boundaries and anaphoric reference.
    Thompson AN; Radvansky GA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Jun; 23(3):849-56. PubMed ID: 26452376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moving through imagined space: Mentally simulating locomotion during spatial description reading.
    Brunyé TT; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 20144826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.