These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26889744)

  • 1. Early and Late Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement Using Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valve in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Analysis.
    Okamoto Y; Yamamoto K; Yoshii S
    J Card Surg; 2016 Apr; 31(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 26889744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
    Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
    JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early mortality after aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthetic vs bioprosthetic valves among Medicare beneficiaries: a population-based cohort study.
    Du DT; McKean S; Kelman JA; Laschinger J; Johnson C; Warnock R; Worrall CM; Sedrakyan A; Encinosa W; MaCurdy TE; Izurieta HS
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Nov; 174(11):1788-95. PubMed ID: 25221895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
    McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients.
    Schelbert EB; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS; Welke KF; Rosenthal GE
    Heart; 2008 Sep; 94(9):1181-8. PubMed ID: 18070945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between biological and mechanical aortic valve prostheses in middle-aged patients matched through propensity score analysis: long-term results.
    Roumieh M; Ius F; Tudorache I; Ismail I; Fleissner F; Haverich A; Cebotari S
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jul; 48(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25312522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.
    Merk DR; Lehmann S; Holzhey DM; Dohmen P; Candolfi P; Misfeld M; Mohr FW; Borger MA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 47(1):11-7; discussion 17. PubMed ID: 24599160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early and Late Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement with Aortic Annular Enlargement: A Propensity Analysis.
    Okamoto Y; Yamamoto K; Sugimoto T; Yoshii S
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 64(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 26334242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.
    Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients 50 to 70 years of age.
    Huckaby LV; Sultan I; Gleason TG; Chen S; Thoma F; Navid F; Kilic A
    J Card Surg; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2589-2597. PubMed ID: 32652638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement.
    Chan V; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry P; Masters R; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 144(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 21962842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
    Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit?
    Kulik A; Al-Saigh M; Chan V; Masters RG; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Jan; 85(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 18154789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: is it durable enough?
    Une D; Ruel M; David TE
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 46(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 24510909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial.
    Hammermeister K; Sethi GK; Henderson WG; Grover FL; Oprian C; Rahimtoola SH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Oct; 36(4):1152-8. PubMed ID: 11028464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.