These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26890370)
1. Assessing agreement with multiple raters on correlated kappa statistics. Cao H; Sen PK; Peery AF; Dellon ES Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):935-43. PubMed ID: 26890370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Asymptotic distributions of kappa statistics and their differences with many raters, many rating categories and two conditions. Grassano L; Pagana G; Daperno M; Bibbona E; Gasparini M Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 29110316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing the equality of two dependent kappa statistics. Donner A; Shoukri MM; Klar N; Bartfay E Stat Med; 2000 Feb; 19(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 10649303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nomogram for sample size calculation on a straightforward basis for the kappa statistic. Hong H; Choi Y; Hahn S; Park SK; Park BJ Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):673-80. PubMed ID: 25088752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A sequential test for assessing observed agreement between raters. Bersimis S; Sachlas A; Chakraborti S Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):128-145. PubMed ID: 28898444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-inferiority test and confidence interval for the difference in correlated proportions in diagnostic procedures based on multiple raters. Saeki H; Tango T Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3313-27. PubMed ID: 21953516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Homogeneity score test for the intraclass version of the kappa statistics and sample-size determination in multiple or stratified studies. Nam JM Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1027-35. PubMed ID: 14969482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inference procedures for assessing interobserver agreement among multiple raters. Altaye M; Donner A; Klar N Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):584-8. PubMed ID: 11414588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data. Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing interrater agreement on binary measurements via intraclass odds ratio. Locatelli I; Rousson V Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):962-73. PubMed ID: 26988408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing the homogeneity of kappa statistics. Donner A; Eliasziw M; Klar N Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 8934591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A general goodness-of-fit approach for inference procedures concerning the kappa statistic. Altaye M; Donner A; Eliasziw M Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2479-88. PubMed ID: 11512137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What you need to know about statistics, part II: reliability of diagnostic and screening tests. Zidan M; Thomas RL; Slovis TL Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 25726014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robustness of Vanacore A; Pellegrino MS Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1986-2004. PubMed ID: 35124830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the agreement of two quantitative assays with repeated measurements. Zhong B; Shao J J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 12635904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A non-iterative confidence interval estimating procedure for the intraclass kappa statistic with multinomial outcomes. Zou G; Klar N Biom J; 2005 Oct; 47(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 16385909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]