These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2689059)

  • 21. Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. An overview.
    Federgreen WR
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Apr; 80(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 8505613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medicare program; payment to hospitals for furnishing photocopies to peer review organizations--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1992 Oct; 57(203):47779-87. PubMed ID: 10121918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute.
    Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB
    Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peer review, hearing requirements, and antitrust: maximizing Federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act compliance and immunity.
    Snelson EA
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1992 Sep; 81(9):495-7. PubMed ID: 1402428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. New threats to privacy of medical records.
    Snyder JD; Crawford JB
    Physicians Manage; 1979 Jul; 19(7):68-70. PubMed ID: 10297558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Costs or quality: what do the watchdogs watch?
    Heinz J
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):10, 12. PubMed ID: 10301021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organizations; imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(76):15233-40. PubMed ID: 10299475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in PRO review in Missouri to be more evolutionary than revolutionary.
    Jaco D
    Mo Med; 1991 Nov; 88(11):739-42. PubMed ID: 1805125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review program; solicitation of comments on proposed PRO program scope of work--HCFA. Notice.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Nov; 50(218):46702. PubMed ID: 10300403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strategies for appeals of PRO payment denials.
    Manning MM; Miller WJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 10107508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medicare and Medicaid programs; Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization (PRO); correction--HCFA.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Oct; 50(200):41886-7. PubMed ID: 10300452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Problems arising between physicians in private practice and medicare.
    Zaslow J
    Leg Med; 1985; ():357-66. PubMed ID: 3915050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On changing relations with the PRO or belling the cat.
    Loschen DJ
    Nebr Med J; 1992 Jun; 77(6):119-20. PubMed ID: 1620264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physicians and the PROs' third scope of work.
    Gosfield AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 10303854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health care programs: fraud and abuse; revisions to the PRO sanctions process--HHS. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1995 Dec; 60(238):63634-45. PubMed ID: 10153804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Medicare bills to restore confidence; expand PROs.
    Borfitz D
    Home Health J; 1986 Aug; 7(8):2, 11, 13. PubMed ID: 10301011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New Jersey's case for local control of the Medicare review process.
    Kingsley DI; Rodi A
    N J Med; 1992 Jul; 89(7):527-8. PubMed ID: 1305270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.