These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26890899)
1. Non-destructive evaluation of teeth restored with different composite resins using synchrotron based micro-imaging. Fatima A; Kulkarni VK; Banda NR; Agrawal AK; Singh B; Sarkar PS; Tripathi S; Shripathi T; Kashyap Y; Sinha A J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(1):119-32. PubMed ID: 26890899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dejak B; Młotkowski A Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Carrera CA; Lan C; Escobar-Sanabria D; Li Y; Rudney J; Aparicio C; Fok A Dent Mater; 2015 Apr; 31(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 25649496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hard X-ray phase-contrast-enhanced micro-CT for quantifying interfaces within brittle dense root-filling-restored human teeth. Prates Soares A; Blunck U; Bitter K; Paris S; Rack A; Zaslansky P J Synchrotron Radiat; 2020 Jul; 27(Pt 4):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 33566011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Periapical status of non-root-filled teeth with resin composite, amalgam, or full crown restorations: a cross-sectional study of a Swedish adult population. Dawson V; Petersson K; Wolf E; Akerman S J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 25043330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Aranha AC; Pimenta LA Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations. Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-destructive examination of interfacial debonding using acoustic emission. Li H; Li J; Yun X; Liu X; Fok AS Dent Mater; 2011 Oct; 27(10):964-71. PubMed ID: 21752458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Zirconia enriched dental adhesive: a solution for OCT contrast enhancement. Demonstrative study by synchrotron radiation microtomography. Rominu M; Manescu A; Sinescu C; Negrutiu ML; Topala F; Rominu RO; Bradu A; Jackson DA; Giuliani A; Podoleanu AG Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 24530139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Presentation of gaps around endodontic access cavity restoration by phase contrast-enhanced micro-CT. Križnar I; Zanini F; Fidler A Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2371-2381. PubMed ID: 30302609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets. Oginni AO; Adeleke AA J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth. Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear bond strength of restorations applied to un-complicated crown fractures: an in vitro study. Pamir T; Eden E; Sebahtin Ahmed S Dent Traumatol; 2012 Apr; 28(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 22051058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations. Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth. Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations. Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro. Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth. Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]