792 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26891130)
1. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner.
van der Beek FB; Boermans PP; Verbist BM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16377994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of intracochlear electrode position and correlation with behavioural thresholds in CII and 90K cochlear implants.
Filipo R; Mancini P; Panebianco V; Viccaro M; Covelli E; Vergari V; Passariello R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 128(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 18274915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of cochlear implant electrode position on performance.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Verbist BM; Muurling TJ; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(3):202-11. PubMed ID: 25924706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Population-based prediction of fitting levels for individual cochlear implant recipients.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25413720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants.
Collins A; Foghsgaard S; Druce E; Margani V; Mejia O; O'Leary S
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 38238914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception.
Yukawa K; Cohen L; Blamey P; Pyman B; Tungvachirakul V; O'Leary S
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 15084821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the HiFocus Mid-Scala and HiFocus 1J Electrode Array: Angular Insertion Depths and Speech Perception Outcomes.
van der Jagt MA; Briaire JJ; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(5):316-325. PubMed ID: 27871074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.
Giardina CK; Brown KD; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Hutson KA; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):833-848. PubMed ID: 30335669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.
Skinner MW; Ketten DR; Holden LK; Harding GW; Smith PG; Gates GA; Neely JG; Kletzker GR; Brunsden B; Blocker B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 3(3):332-50. PubMed ID: 12382107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Snel-Bongers J; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e9-20. PubMed ID: 24196418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the 'Fitting to Outcomes eXpert' (FOX®) with established cochlear implant users.
Buechner A; Vaerenberg B; Gazibegovic D; Brendel M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts P; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 24950595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of electrode array length on frequency-place mismatch and speech perception with cochlear implants.
Venail F; Mathiolon C; Menjot de Champfleur S; Piron JP; Sicard M; Villemus F; Vessigaud MA; Sterkers-Artieres F; Mondain M; Uziel A
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 25678235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.
Beck RL; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Ketterer MC
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 38509805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Role of Electrode Placement in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients.
De Seta D; Nguyen Y; Bonnard D; Ferrary E; Godey B; Bakhos D; Mondain M; Deguine O; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D; Mosnier I
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 27165685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychophysical Map Stability in Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: Comparing Current Audiology Methods to a New Statistical Definition.
Domville-Lewis C; Santa Maria PL; Upson G; Chester-Browne R; Atlas MD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 25710778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
