211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26891465)
1. Observed activation status of lane departure warning and forward collision warning of Honda vehicles at dealership service centers.
Reagan IJ; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):827-32. PubMed ID: 26891465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
Kusano KD; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring relationships between observed activation rates and functional attributes of lane departure prevention.
Reagan IJ; Cicchino JB; Montalbano CJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):424-430. PubMed ID: 31074631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential occupant injury reduction in the U.S. vehicle fleet for lane departure warning-equipped vehicles in single-vehicle crashes.
Kusano K; Gorman TI; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S157-64. PubMed ID: 25307382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.
Thompson JP; Mackenzie JRR; Dutschke JK; Baldock MRJ; Raftery SJ; Wall J
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():34-40. PubMed ID: 29544135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of lane departure warning on police-reported crash rates.
Cicchino JB
J Safety Res; 2018 Sep; 66():61-70. PubMed ID: 30121111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of roll stability control and lane departure warning systems using carrier-collected data.
Hickman JS; Guo F; Camden MC; Hanowski RJ; Medina A; Mabry JE
J Safety Res; 2015 Feb; 52():59-63. PubMed ID: 25662883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Net-societal and net-private benefits of some existing vehicle crash avoidance technologies.
Khan A; Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():207-216. PubMed ID: 30772676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Residual road departure crashes after full deployment of LDW and LDP systems.
Riexinger LE; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S177-S181. PubMed ID: 31381442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The safety potential of lane departure warning systems-A descriptive real-world study of fatal lane departure passenger car crashes in Sweden.
Sternlund S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S18-S23. PubMed ID: 28394639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies.
Jermakian JS
Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():338-46. PubMed ID: 22763402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost and benefit estimates of partially-automated vehicle collision avoidance technologies.
Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):104-15. PubMed ID: 27423430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field effectiveness of general motors advanced driver assistance and headlighting systems.
Leslie AJ; Kiefer RJ; Meitzner MR; Flannagan CA
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106275. PubMed ID: 34242861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
