These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26891947)

  • 1. Introduction: Engaging researchers on developing, using, and improving knowledge synthesis methods: a series of articles describing the results of a scoping review on emerging knowledge synthesis methods.
    Straus SE; Kastner M; Soobiah C; Antony J; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():15-8. PubMed ID: 26891947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available.
    Tricco AC; Antony J; Soobiah C; Kastner M; Cogo E; MacDonald H; D'Souza J; Hui W; Straus SE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():36-42. PubMed ID: 26891951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods, strategies and technologies used to conduct a scoping literature review of collaboration between primary care and public health.
    Valaitis R; Martin-Misener R; Wong ST; MacDonald M; Meagher-Stewart D; Austin P; Kaczorowski J; O-Mara L; Savage R;
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2012 Jul; 13(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 22336106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.
    Khalil H; Peters M; Godfrey CM; McInerney P; Soares CB; Parker D
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2016 Apr; 13(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 26821833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: the what, why, and how to.
    McKinstry C; Brown T; Gustafsson L
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2014 Apr; 61(2):58-66. PubMed ID: 24125011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews.
    Colquhoun HL; Jesus TS; O'Brien KK; Tricco AC; Chui A; Zarin W; Lillie E; Hitzig SL; Straus S
    Clin Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 31(9):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 28118743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist.
    Ballard M; Montgomery P
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 28074553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews.
    Thomas A; Lubarsky S; Durning SJ; Young ME
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 27782918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
    Pham MT; Rajić A; Greig JD; Sargeant JM; Papadopoulos A; McEwen SA
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):371-85. PubMed ID: 26052958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine.
    Lane D; Dykeman J; Ferri M; Goldsmith CH; Stelfox HT
    J Crit Care; 2013 Aug; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 23312123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knowledge synthesis research: a bibliometric analysis.
    Perrier L; Lightfoot D; Kealey MR; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():50-7. PubMed ID: 26912123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
    Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic.
    Schünemann HJ; Moja L
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):4. PubMed ID: 25589399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.
    Davis K; Drey N; Gould D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1386-400. PubMed ID: 19328488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
    Peters MD; Godfrey CM; Khalil H; McInerney P; Parker D; Soares CB
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial Note on: High-quality systematic reviews within spinal cord research.
    Lidal IB
    Spinal Cord; 2014 Oct; 52(10):721. PubMed ID: 25091109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A response to Harris, Gould, and Fujiura: Beyond scoping reviews: a case for mixed-methods research reviews.
    Fitzgerald SM; Rumrill PD; Merchant WR
    Work; 2015 Jan; 50(2):1-12. PubMed ID: 25503884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review Typology: The Basic Types of Reviews for Synthesizing Evidence for the Purpose of Knowledge Translation.
    Samnani SS; Vaska M; Ahmed S; Turin TC
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Oct; 27(10):635-641. PubMed ID: 29056126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update in Gynecology and Obstetrics: reviews and databases.
    Conde DM; Amaral WN; Pinto-Neto AM; de Andrade JM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 278(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 18491118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.