These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26891951)

  • 1. Knowledge synthesis methods for generating or refining theory: a scoping review reveals that little guidance is available.
    Tricco AC; Antony J; Soobiah C; Kastner M; Cogo E; MacDonald H; D'Souza J; Hui W; Straus SE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():36-42. PubMed ID: 26891951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Knowledge synthesis methods for integrating qualitative and quantitative data: a scoping review reveals poor operationalization of the methodological steps.
    Tricco AC; Antony J; Soobiah C; Kastner M; MacDonald H; Cogo E; Lillie E; Tran J; Straus SE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():29-35. PubMed ID: 26891948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conceptual recommendations for selecting the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to answer research questions related to complex evidence.
    Kastner M; Antony J; Soobiah C; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():43-9. PubMed ID: 26912124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method.
    Tricco AC; Soobiah C; Antony J; Cogo E; MacDonald H; Lillie E; Tran J; D'Souza J; Hui W; Perrier L; Welch V; Horsley T; Straus SE; Kastner M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():19-28. PubMed ID: 26891949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
    Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 7: Qualitative evidence synthesis for emerging themes in primary care research: Scoping review, meta-ethnography and rapid realist review.
    Moser A; Korstjens I
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2023 Oct; 29(1):2274467. PubMed ID: 37902265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods of synthesizing qualitative research studies for health technology assessment.
    Ring N; Jepson R; Ritchie K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 22004781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review.
    Kastner M; Tricco AC; Soobiah C; Lillie E; Perrier L; Horsley T; Welch V; Cogo E; Antony J; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():114. PubMed ID: 22862833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for knowledge synthesis: an overview.
    Whittemore R; Chao A; Jang M; Minges KE; Park C
    Heart Lung; 2014; 43(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 25012634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute.
    Petticrew M; Rehfuess E; Noyes J; Higgins JP; Mayhew A; Pantoja T; Shemilt I; Sowden A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1230-43. PubMed ID: 23953082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knowledge synthesis research: a bibliometric analysis.
    Perrier L; Lightfoot D; Kealey MR; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():50-7. PubMed ID: 26912123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge Syntheses in Medical Education: Demystifying Scoping Reviews.
    Thomas A; Lubarsky S; Durning SJ; Young ME
    Acad Med; 2017 Feb; 92(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 27782918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stigma reduction intervention strategies on HIV test uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol.
    Thapa S; Hannes K; Cargo M; Buve A; Mathei C
    Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():142. PubMed ID: 26527403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods, applications, interpretations and challenges of interrupted time series (ITS) data: protocol for a scoping review.
    Ewusie JE; Blondal E; Soobiah C; Beyene J; Thabane L; Straus SE; Hamid JS
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(6):e016018. PubMed ID: 28674142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review.
    Walsh D; Downe S
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Apr; 50(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 15788085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist.
    Ballard M; Montgomery P
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 28074553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies.
    Barroso J; Gollop CJ; Sandelowski M; Meynell J; Pearce PF; Collins LJ
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Mar; 25(2):153-78. PubMed ID: 12666641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.