These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26892113)

  • 21. Do Beliefs About Font Size Affect Retrospective Metamemory Judgments in Addition to Prospective Judgments?
    Luna K; Albuquerque PB
    Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):172-184. PubMed ID: 35975625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How font size affects judgments of learning: Simultaneous mediating effect of item-specific beliefs about fluency and moderating effect of beliefs about font size and memory.
    Su N; Li T; Zheng J; Hu X; Fan T; Luo L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200888. PubMed ID: 30028846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive memory: animacy effects persist in paired-associate learning.
    VanArsdall JE; Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; Cogdill M
    Memory; 2015; 23(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 24813366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Letter Spacing Does not Affect Memory and Metamemory.
    Luna K; Bueno D; Conde E; Bermúdez D; Gutiérrez MF; Aldana G; Botía I; Rodríguez V; Cadavid S
    Psychol Rep; 2023 May; ():332941231178466. PubMed ID: 37248960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adaptive memory: Is the animacy effect on memory due to richness of encoding?
    Meinhardt MJ; Bell R; Buchner A; Röer JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):416-426. PubMed ID: 31180706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identity priming consistently affects perceptual fluency but only affects metamemory when primes are obvious.
    Susser JA; Jin A; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 26371493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do delayed judgements of learning reduce metamemory illusions? A meta-analysis.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B; Albuquerque PB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 28856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory.
    Susser JA; Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25413684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cue integration in metamemory judgements is strategic.
    Undorf M; Bröder A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):629-642. PubMed ID: 31561744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intuition and metacognition: The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Zander T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 27815819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Prefrontal Cortex Alters Encoding and Judgments of Learning Based on Fluency.
    Gaynor AM; Chua EF
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 31(11):1710-1725. PubMed ID: 31322469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Higher judgements of learning for emotional words: processing fluency or memory beliefs?
    Pierce BH; McCain JL; Stevens AR; Frank DJ
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):714-730. PubMed ID: 37021706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Paired-associate learning, animacy, and imageability effects in the survival advantage.
    Kazanas SA; Altarriba J; O'Brien EG
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):244-255. PubMed ID: 31916198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Words in larger font are perceived as more important: explaining the belief that font size affects memory.
    Luna K; Nogueira M; Albuquerque PB
    Memory; 2019 Apr; 27(4):555-560. PubMed ID: 30293477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Animate and Inanimate Words Demonstrate Equivalent Retrieval Dynamics Despite the Occurrence of the Animacy Advantage.
    Serra MJ
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():661451. PubMed ID: 34149553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manipulations of richness of encoding do not modulate the animacy effect on memory.
    Komar GF; Mieth L; Buchner A; Bell R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; 50(4):580-594. PubMed ID: 37227874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task.
    Bugaiska A; Grégoire L; Camblats AM; Gelin M; Méot A; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):882-889. PubMed ID: 29716460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A categorical recall strategy does not explain animacy effects in episodic memory.
    VanArsdall JE; Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; Cogdill M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):761-771. PubMed ID: 26930264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.