These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26892364)

  • 1. Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill Composite Resins.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Saleh B; Nabih S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016; 28(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 26892364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cuspal Deflection in Premolar Teeth Restored with Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composite Materials.
    Elsharkasi MM; Platt JA; Cook NB; Yassen GH; Matis BA
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):E1-E9. PubMed ID: 29284100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material.
    McHugh LEJ; Politi I; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):e329-e335. PubMed ID: 28688735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Cuspal Deflection and Microleakage of Premolar Teeth restored with Three Restorative Materials.
    Yarmohamadi E; Jahromi PR; Akbarzadeh M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):684-689. PubMed ID: 29959297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Assessment of Cuspal Deflection in Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill and Conventional Composite Resins.
    Yarmohammadi E; Kasraei S; Sadeghi Y
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(6):407-414. PubMed ID: 33089241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bulk fill restoratives: to cap or not to cap--that is the question?
    Tomaszewska IM; Kearns JO; Ilie N; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 25625673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
    Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volumetric Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored With Different Paste-like Bulk-fill Resin Composites Evaluated by Microcomputed Tomography.
    Demirel G; Baltacioglu IH; Kolsuz ME; Ocak M; Bilecenoglu B; Orhan K
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):143-150. PubMed ID: 31283421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of using silorane-based resin composite for restoring conservative cavities on the changes in cuspal deflection.
    Shabayek NM; Hassan FM; Mobarak EH
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):E1-8. PubMed ID: 23088187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials.
    Moorthy A; Hogg CH; Dowling AH; Grufferty BF; Benetti AR; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):500-5. PubMed ID: 22390980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of composite insertion technique on cuspal deflection using an in vitro simulation model.
    Jafarpour S; El-Badrawy W; Jazi HS; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 22313278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of polymerization shrinkage of different composites using a photoelastic method.
    Rullman I; Patyna M; Janssen B; Willershausen B
    Am J Dent; 2017 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 29178709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite.
    Atalay C; Yazici AR; Horuztepe A; Nagas E; Ertan A; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(5):E131-E140. PubMed ID: 27352045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Different Composite Restorations on the Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Different Insertion Techniques- An In vitro Study.
    Singhal S; Gurtu A; Singhal A; Bansal R; Mohan S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Aug; 11(8):ZC67-ZC70. PubMed ID: 28969277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques.
    Campodonico CE; Tantbirojn D; Olin PS; Versluis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Oct; 142(10):1176-82. PubMed ID: 21965491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative composites to dentin.
    Mandava J; Vegesna DP; Ravi R; Boddeda MR; Uppalapati LV; Ghazanfaruddin MD
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Aug; 9(8):e1023-e1028. PubMed ID: 28936294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.