These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26892507)

  • 41. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical and technical evaluation of a new self-monitoring blood glucose meter: assessment of analytical and user error.
    Lehmann R; Kayrooz S; Greuter H; Spinas GA
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2001 Aug; 53(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 11403861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. System Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of an Improved System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Liebing C; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 29291625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Feb; 16(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 24205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time.
    Bailey T; Zisser H; Chang A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Dec; 11(12):749-55. PubMed ID: 20001675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A multicenter study of the accuracy of the One Touch Ultra home glucose meter in children with type 1 diabetes.
    Diabetes Research In Children Network (Direcnet) Study Group
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):933-41. PubMed ID: 14709195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems, Dexcom G4 Platinum and Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite System, at Rest and During Exercise.
    Taleb N; Emami A; Suppere C; Messier V; Legault L; Chiasson JL; Rabasa-Lhoret R; Haidar A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Sep; 18(9):561-7. PubMed ID: 27356172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Chinese Individuals.
    Guo X; Wang Y; Ma Y; Wang J; Lu G; Chen L; Huang Y; Beer A; Dong L; Peng Y
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1416-1418. PubMed ID: 27257170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of blood glucose estimates in adolescents with diabetes mellitus.
    Ruggiero L; Kairys S; Fritz G; Wood M
    J Adolesc Health; 1991 Mar; 12(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 2015234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Review of Blood Glucose Monitor Accuracy.
    King F; Ahn D; Hsiao V; Porco T; Klonoff DC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Dec; 20(12):843-856. PubMed ID: 30376362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.
    Parkes JL; Slatin SL; Pardo S; Ginsberg BH
    Diabetes Care; 2000 Aug; 23(8):1143-8. PubMed ID: 10937512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes.
    Weinzimer SA; Tamborlane WV; Chase HP; Garg SK
    Curr Diab Rep; 2004 Apr; 4(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 15035968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [THE VERIFICATION OF ANALYTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE MODELS OF GLUCOMETERS].
    Timofeev AV; Khaibulina ET; Mamonov RA; Gorst KA
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2016 Jan; 61(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 27183728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Atmospheric pressure effects on glucose monitoring devices.
    Piepmeier EH; Hammett-Stabler C; Price ME; Kemper GB; Davis MG
    Diabetes Care; 1995 Mar; 18(3):423-4. PubMed ID: 7555495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy evaluation of two systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197.
    Wang Y
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 8(6):1243-4. PubMed ID: 25155844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysis of the performance of the CONTOUR® TS Blood Glucose Monitoring System: when regulatory performance criteria are met, should we have confidence to use a medical device with all patients?
    Lyon ME; Lyon AW
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):206-8. PubMed ID: 21303646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Dry clinical chemistry--blood sugar self-monitoring].
    Murakami J; Murakami T
    Rinsho Byori; 1997 Nov; Suppl():45-51. PubMed ID: 9508606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. ISO 15197: 2013 Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System's Measurement Accuracy.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Kamecke U; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1275-1276. PubMed ID: 28849677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.
    Caswell M; Frank J; Viggiani MT; Pardo S; Dunne N; Warchal-Windham ME; Morin R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Mar; 17(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 25494048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of OneTouch Verio(®), a new blood glucose self-monitoring system for patients with diabetes.
    Littmann K; Petersen ER; Pussinen C; Danielson K; Djurisic S; Eilertsen H; Garabet L; Greibe E; Lauritzen T; Olsen DA; Othman S; Palimaru I; Westerlund J
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2013; 73(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 23473019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.