These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26892773)

  • 1. An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 26892773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Smith V; Carlsen AN; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):496-506. PubMed ID: 28243728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-controlled KR schedules: does repetition order matter?
    Patterson JT; Carter MJ; Hansen S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):567-79. PubMed ID: 24054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External Control of Knowledge of Results: Learner Involvement Enhances Motor Skill Transfer.
    Figueiredo LS; Ugrinowitsch H; Freire AB; Shea JB; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Apr; 125(2):400-416. PubMed ID: 29350078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-controlled knowledge of results: age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection.
    Carter MJ; Patterson JT
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1459-72. PubMed ID: 23164628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-Controlled Feedback and Learner Impulsivity in Sequential Motor Learning.
    Ferreira BP; Malloy-Diniz LF; Parma JO; Nogueira NGHM; Apolinário-Souza T; Ugrinowitsch H; Lage GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2019 Feb; 126(1):157-179. PubMed ID: 30398959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: the similarities and differences between physical and observational practice.
    Badets A; Blandin Y
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(4):257-68. PubMed ID: 20862778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the Preferred Self-Controlled KR Schedules of Learners and Peers During Motor Skill Learning.
    McRae M; Patterson JT; Hansen S
    J Mot Behav; 2015; 47(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 25893852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-examining the temporal locus of knowledge of results (KR): a self-paced approach to learning.
    Travlos AK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 2):1073-87. PubMed ID: 10710754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context.
    Patterson JT; Carter M; Sanli E
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Dec; 82(4):624-33. PubMed ID: 22276404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Average KR schedule in learning of timing: influence of length for summary knowledge of results and task complexity.
    Ishikura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):911-24. PubMed ID: 16491697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal locus of knowledge of results: a meta-analytic review.
    Travlos AK; Pratt J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Feb; 80(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 7624211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the impact of error estimation on the effects of self-controlled feedback.
    Barros JAC; Yantha ZD; Carter MJ; Hussien J; Ste-Marie DM
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Feb; 63():182-198. PubMed ID: 30580207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects on Performance of Interpolated Tasks During the KR Delay or the Post-KR Delay Interval.
    Ohashi Y; Osada H
    J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc; 1998; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 25792875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance: a replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005).
    Carter MJ; Carlsen AN; Ste-Marie DM
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1325. PubMed ID: 25477846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. KR-withdrawal and self-paced motor performance.
    Travlos AK
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 2):1111-26. PubMed ID: 10710759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Self-Controlled Knowledge of Results on Learning a Taekwondo Serial Skill.
    Januário MS; Figueiredo LS; Portes LL; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2019 Dec; 126(6):1178-1194. PubMed ID: 31422740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results without visual feedback in learning a golf-putting task.
    Ishikura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):225-33. PubMed ID: 18459371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning.
    Anderson DI; Magill RA; Sekiya H; Ryan G
    J Mot Behav; 2005 May; 37(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 15883120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-control of feedback during motor learning: accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback.
    Hansen S; Pfeiffer J; Patterson JT
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 21347953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.