These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Peer review, hearing requirements, and antitrust: maximizing Federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act compliance and immunity. Snelson EA J Med Assoc Ga; 1992 Sep; 81(9):495-7. PubMed ID: 1402428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How physicians can avoid problems with the PRO. Ponder S Colo Med; 1989 Dec; 86(18):387-8. PubMed ID: 2689059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organizations; imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(76):15233-40. PubMed ID: 10299475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Working with the PRO. Foundation for Health Care Evaluation. Minn Med; 1989 May; 72(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 2659957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A second opinion on PROS. Weissenstein E Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(19):45-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10133800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pro third scope of work: two major changes. Ponder S Colo Med; 1989 Nov; 86(17):344-5. PubMed ID: 2680235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review shifts focus to patterns of care. Carlson B Indiana Med; 1994; 87(6):458-61. PubMed ID: 7806858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality Assurance Act could 'watch' HHAs. Home Health J; 1986 Mar; 7(3):4, 8. PubMed ID: 10300707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ? Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. WIPRO clarifies changes to quality review process. Wis Med J; 1993 Aug; 92(8):479. PubMed ID: 8237040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Possible changes in store for PRO program. Harrop DE Pa Med; 1992 Jul; 95(7):34. PubMed ID: 1408266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bivens actions not allowed against peer review organizations. Margolis RE Healthspan; 1994 Feb; 11(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 10132989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicare program implements fourth "scope of work" for peer review. Manning MM Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jul; 8(7):13-6. PubMed ID: 10126730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicare and Medicaid programs; Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization (PRO); correction--HCFA. Fed Regist; 1985 Oct; 50(200):41886-7. PubMed ID: 10300452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organizations--imposition of sanctions on health care practitioners and providers of health care services--HCFA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15335-47. PubMed ID: 10299990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medicare program, utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29041-50. PubMed ID: 10299607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]