These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26894348)
1. Evaluation of commercial extension plates for the ACR CT accreditation phantom. Greene-Donnelly KA; Ogden KM J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):416-420. PubMed ID: 26894348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical assessment of a mobile CT scanner for image-guided brachytherapy. Chernavsky NE; Morcos M; Wu P; Viswanathan AN; Siewerdsen JH J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):187-200. PubMed ID: 31578811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Channelized hotelling observer-based low-contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom: Part II. Repeatability study. Fan M; Zhou Z; McCollough C; Yu L Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1714-1725. PubMed ID: 38305692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging. So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardizing CT lung density measure across scanner manufacturers. Chen-Mayer HH; Fuld MK; Hoppel B; Judy PF; Sieren JP; Guo J; Lynch DA; Possolo A; Fain SB Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):974-985. PubMed ID: 28060414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 100 days with scans of the same Catphan phantom on the same CT scanner. Husby E; Svendsen ED; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):224-231. PubMed ID: 28921910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners. Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate and efficient measurement of channelized Hotelling observer-based low-contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom. Fan M; Thayib T; McCollough C; Yu L Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):737-749. PubMed ID: 36273393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom. Sande EP; Martinsen AC; Hole EO; Olerud HM Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5123-35. PubMed ID: 20714048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT Phantom Evaluation of 67,392 American College of Radiology Accreditation Examinations: Implications for Opportunistic Screening of Osteoporosis Using CT. Boutin RD; Hernandez AM; Lenchik L; Seibert JA; Gress DA; Boone JM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):447-452. PubMed ID: 32755177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The automated measurement of CT number linearity using an ACR accreditation phantom. Anam C; Amilia R; Naufal A; Budi WS; Maya AT; Dougherty G Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 36541467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of CT parameters on the physical quantities related to image quality for two MDCT scanners using the ACR accreditation phantom: A phantom study. Alikhani B; Jamali L; Raatschen HJ; Wacker F; Werncke T Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 28687287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scanner and kVp dependence of measured CT numbers in the ACR CT phantom. Cropp RJ; Seslija P; Tso D; Thakur Y J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 14(6):4417. PubMed ID: 24257284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Note: Proof of concept for radiomics-based quality assurance for computed tomography. Branco LRF; Ger RB; Mackin DS; Zhou S; Court LE; Layman RR J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):199-205. PubMed ID: 31609076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the ACR CT accreditation phantom for routine image quality assurance on both CT and CBCT imaging systems in a radiotherapy environment. Hobson MA; Soisson ET; Davis SD; Parker W J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4835. PubMed ID: 25207412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification and homogenization of image noise between two CT scanner models. Einstein SA; Rong XJ; Jensen CT; Liu X J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):174-178. PubMed ID: 31859454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volume computed tomography air kerma index and image quality evaluation in Brazil. Mecca FA; Andrade ME; Jakubiak RR; Khoury HJ; Dias SK; Miquelin CA; Nader A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):452-6. PubMed ID: 21561947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study. Marsh RM; Silosky MS Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 28133763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lesion insertion in the projection domain: Methods and initial results. Chen B; Leng S; Yu L; Yu Z; Ma C; McCollough C Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7034-42. PubMed ID: 26632058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]