These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26894360)

  • 1. Investigation of optimal display size for viewing T1-weighted MR images of the brain using a digital contrast-detail phantom.
    Fujita H; Kuwahata N; Hattori H; Kinoshita H; Fukuda H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):353-359. PubMed ID: 26894360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of optimal display size for detecting ground-glass opacity on high resolution computed tomography using a new digital contrast-detail phantom.
    Yamaguchi M; Fujita H; Bessho Y; Inoue T; Asai Y; Murase K
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 20462717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms.
    Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Jason Stafford R; Zhou S; Court LE
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5153-5161. PubMed ID: 28622410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different pixel pitch and maximum luminance of medical grade displays may result in different evaluations of digital radiography images.
    Laffranchi A; Cicero C; Lualdi M; Ciniselli CM; Calareso G; Canestrini S; Greco FG; Alberioli E; Cavatorta C; Guarise A; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Scaramuzza D; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Marchianò A
    Radiol Med; 2018 Aug; 123(8):586-592. PubMed ID: 29671208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating clinical implications of 15-mega-sub-pixel liquid-crystal display in phase-contrast mammography.
    Takane Y; Kawasumi Y; Sato M; Horie T; Ishibashi T
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Jul; 23(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 25851738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size.
    Suryanarayanan S; Karellas A; Vedantham S; Sechopoulos I; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 17522348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of optimal viewing size for detecting nodular ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography with cine-mode display.
    Yamaguchi M; Bessho Y; Inoue T; Asai Y; Matsumoto T; Murase K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jan; 4(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 20820964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of monitor display resolution and displayed image size on the spatial resolution of ultra-high-resolution CT images: a phantom study.
    Ikushima Y; Tokurei S; Sato S; Ikushima K; Hashimoto N; Morishita J; Yabuuchi H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Jun; 15(2):147-155. PubMed ID: 35462583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of simulated multiple sclerosis lesions on T2-weighted and FLAIR images of the brain: observer performance.
    Woo JH; Henry LP; Krejza J; Melhem ER
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 16990678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT.
    Yu L; Chen B; Kofler JM; Favazza CP; Leng S; Kupinski MA; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3990-3999. PubMed ID: 28555878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency encoding for simultaneous display of multimodality images.
    Quarantelli M; Alfano B; Larobina M; Tedeschi E; Brunetti A; Covelli EM; Ciarmiello A; Mainolfi C; Salvatore M
    J Nucl Med; 1999 Mar; 40(3):442-7. PubMed ID: 10086709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Display of merged multimodality brain images using interleaved pixels with independent color scales.
    Rehm K; Strother SC; Anderson JR; Schaper KA; Rottenberg DA
    J Nucl Med; 1994 Nov; 35(11):1815-21. PubMed ID: 7965164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical analysis of monitor display functions affecting observer diagnostic performance of CT image on liquid crystal display monitors.
    Yamaguchi M; Fujita H; Asai Y; Uemura M; Ookura Y; Matsumoto M; Johkoh T
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Dec; 15(12):2487-96. PubMed ID: 16132924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
    Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multipathway multi-echo (MPME) imaging: all main MR parameters mapped based on a single 3D scan.
    Cheng CC; Preiswerk F; Hoge WS; Kuo TH; Madore B
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1699-1713. PubMed ID: 30320945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quantitative evaluation of low contrast detectability in a brain computed tomography: investigation for the effect of window width on recognition of hyperacute ischemic stroke].
    Nagashima H; Iwasaki T; Sunaga S; Gokan T; Fujii M; Sato K; Negishi T; Shiraishi A; Ogura T; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1408-14. PubMed ID: 22104232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology.
    Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek R; Romanyukha A
    Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):807-14. PubMed ID: 15839353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.