710 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26894686)
21. Performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve using reduced-order modelling and static computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Ihdayhid AR; Sakaguchi T; Linde JJ; Sørgaard MH; Kofoed KF; Fujisawa Y; Hislop-Jambrich J; Nerlekar N; Cameron JD; Munnur RK; Crosset M; Wong DTL; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 30137268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.
Gonzalez JA; Lipinski MJ; Flors L; Shaw PW; Kramer CM; Salerno M
Am J Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 116(9):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26347004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Coronary CT angiography-derived plaque quantification with artificial intelligence CT fractional flow reserve for the identification of lesion-specific ischemia.
von Knebel Doeberitz PL; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; van Assen M; Bauer MJ; Savage RH; Pannell JT; De Santis D; Johnson AA; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Schönberg SO; Nance JW; Tesche C
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2378-2387. PubMed ID: 30523456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study.
Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Pontone G; Conte E; Sonck J; Collet C; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Trabattoni D; Galli S; Montorsi P; Ferrari C; Fabbiocchi F; De Martini S; Annoni A; Mancini ME; Formenti A; Magatelli M; Resta M; Consiglio E; Muscogiuri G; Fiorentini C; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(5):411-417. PubMed ID: 29933938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease.
Coenen A; Rossi A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono AK; Chelu RG; Segreto S; Dijkshoorn ML; Wragg A; van Geuns RM; Pugliese F; Nieman K
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 10(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 28109933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve.
Wang R; Renker M; Schoepf UJ; Wichmann JL; Fuller SR; Rier JD; Bayer RR; Steinberg DH; De Cecco CN; Baumann S
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1509-1515. PubMed ID: 26022519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Sampaio F; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Portugal P; Gama V; Nagel E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):730-8. PubMed ID: 23833284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Single-phase coronary artery CT angiography extracted from stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion on third-generation dual-source CT: Validation by coronary angiography.
Yi Y; Wu W; Lin L; Zhang HZ; Qian H; Shen ZJ; Wang Y; Jin ZY; Litt H; Wang YN
Int J Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 269():343-349. PubMed ID: 30224034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic performance of on-site computed CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid structure interactions: comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio.
Fujimoto S; Kawasaki T; Kumamaru KK; Kawaguchi Y; Dohi T; Okonogi T; Ri K; Yamada S; Takamura K; Kato E; Kato Y; Hiki M; Okazaki S; Aoki S; Mitsouras D; Rybicki FJ; Daida H
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 30107511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Caruso D; Baumann S; Renker M; Mangold S; Dyer KT; Varga-Szemes A; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26993434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Coronary artery stenosis-related perfusion ratio using dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a pilot for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Kuwahara N; Tanabe Y; Kido T; Kurata A; Uetani T; Ochi H; Kawaguchi N; Kido T; Ikeda S; Yamaguchi O; Asano M; Mochizuki T
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2020 Oct; 35(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 31630340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A study of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from a simplified method based on coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease.
Shi C; Zhang D; Cao K; Zhang T; Luo L; Liu X; Zhang H
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 28407768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kim YH; Kang JW; Kang SJ; Kweon J; Kim HJ; Lim TH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 26667445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR.
Greif M; von Ziegler F; Bamberg F; Tittus J; Schwarz F; D'Anastasi M; Marcus RP; Schenzle J; Becker C; Nikolaou K; Becker A
Heart; 2013 Jul; 99(14):1004-11. PubMed ID: 23674364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The emerging role of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of coronary perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tashakkor AY; Nicolaou S; Leipsic J; Mancini GB
Can J Cardiol; 2012; 28(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 22542048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.
Ho KT; Chua KC; Klotz E; Panknin C
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Aug; 3(8):811-20. PubMed ID: 20705260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic Performance of Transluminal Attenuation Gradient and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from 320-Detector Row CT Angiography to Diagnose Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: An NXT Substudy.
Ko BS; Wong DT; Nørgaard BL; Leong DP; Cameron JD; Gaur S; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Kuribayashi S; Kimura T; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26444662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
