710 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26894686)
41. The diagnostic performance of on-site workstation-based computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve. Comparison with myocardium perfusion imaging.
Fukuoka R; Kawasaki T; Umeji K; Okonogi T; Koga N
Heart Vessels; 2022 Jan; 37(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 34263357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Stress Myocardial Perfusion CT in Patients Suspected of Having Coronary Artery Disease: Visual and Quantitative Analysis-Validation by Using Fractional Flow Reserve.
Yang DH; Kim YH; Roh JH; Kang JW; Han D; Jung J; Kim N; Lee JB; Ahn JM; Lee JY; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Lim TH
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 25880262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Incremental diagnostic accuracy of hybrid SPECT/CT coronary angiography in a population with an intermediate to high pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease.
Schaap J; Kauling RM; Boekholdt SM; Nieman K; Meijboom WB; Post MC; Van der Heyden JA; de Kroon TL; van Es HW; Rensing BJ; Verzijlbergen JF
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 14(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 23291392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve.
Renker M; Schoepf UJ; Wang R; Meinel FG; Rier JD; Bayer RR; Möllmann H; Hamm CW; Steinberg DH; Baumann S
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 114(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 25205628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion.
Magalhães TA; Kishi S; George RT; Arbab-Zadeh A; Vavere AL; Cox C; Matheson MB; Miller JM; Brinker J; Di Carli M; Rybicki FJ; Rochitte CE; Clouse ME; Lima JA
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 25977111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard.
Lipkin I; Telluri A; Kim Y; Sidahmed A; Krepp JM; Choi BG; Jonas R; Marques H; Chang HJ; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Crabtree TR; Earls JP; Choi AD; Min JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):407-419. PubMed ID: 35441530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion.
Yang DH; Kim YH; Roh JH; Kang JW; Ahn JM; Kweon J; Lee JB; Choi SH; Shin ES; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Lim TH
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 18(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 27354345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.
Ponte M; Bettencourt N; Pereira E; Ferreira ND; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Albuquerque A; Gama V; Nagel E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30(8):1589-97. PubMed ID: 25082645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study.
Min JK; Berman DS; Budoff MJ; Jaffer FA; Leipsic J; Leon MB; Mancini GB; Mauri L; Schwartz RS; Shaw LJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 21930103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. On-site assessment of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.
Miyajima K; Motoyama S; Sarai M; Kawai H; Nagahara Y; Matsumoto R; Fujiwara W; Muramatsu T; Takahashi H; Naruse H; Ishii J; Kondo T; Narula J; Izawa H; Ozaki Y
Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 32350637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography derived from low-dose dynamic CT myocardial perfusion: a feasibility study with comparison to invasive coronary angiography.
Dai X; Yu M; Pan J; Lu Z; Shen C; Wang Y; Lu B; Zhang J
Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):4349-4356. PubMed ID: 30413956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial.
Stuijfzand WJ; van Rosendael AR; Lin FY; Chang HJ; van den Hoogen IJ; Gianni U; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson R; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Lu Y; Berman DS; Narula J; Min JK; Bax JJ; Shaw LJ;
JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 5(12):1338-1348. PubMed ID: 32822476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization?
Gaemperli O; Husmann L; Schepis T; Koepfli P; Valenta I; Jenni W; Alkadhi H; Lüscher TF; Kaufmann PA
Eur Heart J; 2009 Dec; 30(23):2921-9. PubMed ID: 19684023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis.
Ko SM; Choi JW; Hwang HK; Song MG; Shin JK; Chee HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 22357990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease.
Melikian N; De Bondt P; Tonino P; De Winter O; Wyffels E; Bartunek J; Heyndrickx GR; Fearon WF; Pijls NH; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Mar; 3(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 20298990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging.
Bamberg F; Becker A; Schwarz F; Marcus RP; Greif M; von Ziegler F; Blankstein R; Hoffmann U; Sommer WH; Hoffmann VS; Johnson TR; Becker HC; Wintersperger BJ; Reiser MF; Nikolaou K
Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 21846761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Improving CCTA-based lesions' hemodynamic significance assessment by accounting for partial volume modeling in automatic coronary lumen segmentation.
Freiman M; Nickisch H; Prevrhal S; Schmitt H; Vembar M; Maurovich-Horvat P; Donnelly P; Goshen L
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1040-1049. PubMed ID: 28112409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making.
Tesche C; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; De Cecco CN; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Langenbach MC; Varga-Szemes A; Jacobs BE; Jochheim D; Baquet M; Bayer RR; Litwin SE; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2121-2127. PubMed ID: 29102036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
