These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2689478)

  • 1. Comparative multicenter studies with TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in eight Swedish hospitals. TRUE Test Study Group.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):846-9. PubMed ID: 2689478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results.
    Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European multicenter study of TRUE Test, Panel 2.
    Wilkinson JD; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Frosch PJ; Gunnarsson Y; Hannuksela M; Lachapelle JM; Ring J; Shaw S; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Apr; 22(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 2189668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. European multicenter study of the TRUE Test.
    Lachapelle JM; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Hannuksela M; Ring J; White IR; Wilkinson J; Fischer T; Billberg K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3180789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore.
    Goh CL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Aug; 27(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 1395634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative multi-center study with TRUE Test and Finn Chamber Patch Test methods in eight Swedish hospitals.
    Ruhnek-Forsbeck M; Fischer T; Meding B; Pettersson L; Stenberg B; Strand A; Sundberg K; Svensson L; Wahlberg JE; Widström L
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 2453990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of A1-test and Finn chamber test.
    Peltonen L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jul; 7(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 7326923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation.
    Moffitt DL; Sharp LA; Sansom JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 12581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in man.
    Lachapelle JM; Antoine JL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):850-4. PubMed ID: 2689479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
    Suneja T; Belsito DV
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finn chamber patch test technique.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Sep; 11(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 6499413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary studies of the TRUE test patch test system in the United States. TRUE Test Study Group.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):841-3. PubMed ID: 2600210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reproducibility of epicutaneous test results].
    Szliska C; Rakoski J
    Z Hautkr; 1988; 63 Suppl 4():67-9. PubMed ID: 2978100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The thin layer rapid use epicutaneous test (TRUE-test), a new patch test method with high accuracy.
    Fischer TI; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 1985 Jan; 112(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3970835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new occlusive patch test system comparable to IQ and Finn chambers.
    Sajun Merchant SZ; Vaidya AD; Salvi A; Joshi RS; Mohile RB
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2014; 80(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 25035351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skin absorption from patch test systems.
    Kim HO; Wester RC; McMaster JA; Bucks DA; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Sep; 17(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 3677660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of IQ-ultra and Finn Chambers test methodologies in detecting 10 common standard allergens that cause allergic contact dermatitis.
    Doumit J; Pratt M
    J Cutan Med Surg; 2012; 16(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 22417991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Duhring chamber. An improved technique for epicutaneous testing of irritant and allergic reactions.
    Frosch PJ; Kligman AM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1979 Mar; 5(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 467029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phenotypic difference between allergic and irritant patch test reactions in man.
    Scheynius A; Fischer T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 May; 14(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 3461912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.