BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2689479)

  • 1. Problems raised by the simultaneous reproducibility of positive allergic patch test reactions in man.
    Lachapelle JM; Antoine JL
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):850-4. PubMed ID: 2689479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results.
    Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative multicenter studies with TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in eight Swedish hospitals. TRUE Test Study Group.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):846-9. PubMed ID: 2689478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients.
    Lachapelle JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2914436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation.
    Moffitt DL; Sharp LA; Sansom JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 12581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. European multicenter study of the TRUE Test.
    Lachapelle JM; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Hannuksela M; Ring J; White IR; Wilkinson J; Fischer T; Billberg K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Aug; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 3180789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore.
    Goh CL
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Aug; 27(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 1395634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European multicenter study of TRUE Test, Panel 2.
    Wilkinson JD; Bruynzeel DP; Ducombs G; Frosch PJ; Gunnarsson Y; Hannuksela M; Lachapelle JM; Ring J; Shaw S; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Apr; 22(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 2189668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative multi-center study with TRUE Test and Finn Chamber Patch Test methods in eight Swedish hospitals.
    Ruhnek-Forsbeck M; Fischer T; Meding B; Pettersson L; Stenberg B; Strand A; Sundberg K; Svensson L; Wahlberg JE; Widström L
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 2453990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
    Suneja T; Belsito DV
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Use of a new prepared patch in general practice (Epiquick)].
    Hornstein M
    Z Hautkr; 1987 Dec; 62(24):1719-23. PubMed ID: 2964138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber patch tests in 220 consecutive patients.
    Lindelöf B
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 May; 22(5):288-9. PubMed ID: 2383987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
    Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
    Ale SI; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. White petrolatum (Ph. Eur.) is virtually non-sensitizing. Analysis of IVDK data on 80 000 patients tested between 1992 and 2004 and short discussion of identification and designation of allergens.
    Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Geier J; Uter W
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jun; 54(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 16787456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of patch tests: comparison of identical test allergens from different commercial sources.
    Schiessl C; Wolber C; Strohal R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jan; 50(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15059100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of A1-test and Finn chamber test.
    Peltonen L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jul; 7(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 7326923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A contemporary Fischer-Maibach investigation: variations in patch test delivery systems and implications for standardization.
    Hamann D; Hamann CR; Hamann C
    Dermatitis; 2013; 24(6):302-12. PubMed ID: 24201463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.