These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2689494)

  • 1. Contraction-related variation in frequency dependence of acoustic properties of canine myocardium.
    Wear KA; Milunski MR; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2067-72. PubMed ID: 2689494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional differences in the cyclic variation of myocardial backscatter that parallel regional differences in contractile performance.
    Mottley JG; Glueck RM; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1617-23. PubMed ID: 6520299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of myocardial contraction on ultrasonic backscatter before and after ischemia.
    Barzilai B; Madaras EI; Sobel BE; Miller JG; Pérez JE
    Am J Physiol; 1984 Sep; 247(3 Pt 2):H478-83. PubMed ID: 6476140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion on cardiac cycle-dependent variation of myocardial ultrasonic backscatter.
    Glueck RM; Mottley JG; Miller JG; Sobel BE; Pérez JE
    Circ Res; 1985 May; 56(5):683-9. PubMed ID: 3888435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential relationships among myocardial stiffness, the measured level of myocardial backscatter ("image brightness"), and the magnitude of the systematic variation of backscatter (cyclic variation) over the heart cycle.
    Holland MR; Wallace KD; Miller JG
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Nov; 17(11):1131-7. PubMed ID: 15502786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation of ultrasonic backscatter and acoustic propagation properties to myofibrillar length and myocardial thickness.
    O'Brien PD; O'Brien WD; Rhyne TL; Warltier DC; Sagar KB
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 7805199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anisotropy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue: II. Measurements in vivo.
    Madaras EI; Perez J; Sobel BE; Mottley JG; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Feb; 83(2):762-9. PubMed ID: 3351134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of methods used to calculate ultrasonic myocardial backscatter in the time domain.
    Moran CM; Sutherland GR; Anderson T; Riemersma RA; McDicken WN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(6):543-50. PubMed ID: 7998375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in myocardial backscatter throughout the cardiac cycle.
    Madaras EI; Barzilai B; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Jul; 5(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 6685368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Myocardial ultrasonic backscatter for characterization of ischemia and reperfusion: relationship to wall motion.
    Barzilai B; Vered Z; Mohr GA; Wear KA; Courtois M; Sobel BE; Miller JG; Pérez JE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1990; 16(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 2396328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of frequency on the magnitude of cyclic variation of backscatter in dogs and implications for prompt detection of acute myocardial ischemia.
    Wear KA; Milunski MR; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1991; 38(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 18267613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [An approach of in vivo measurement for ultrasonic myocardial tissue characterization].
    Fujiwara M; Yokoi H; Inage T; Inaoka Y; Nagatsuka K; Kawanishi K; Senda S; Matsuo H
    Rinsho Byori; 1989 Jul; 37(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 2691737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The myocardial signature: absolute backscatter, cyclical variation, frequency variation, and statistics.
    Rhyne TL; Sagar KB; Wann SL; Haasler G
    Ultrason Imaging; 1986 Apr; 8(2):107-20. PubMed ID: 3535216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of quantitative backscatter echocardiographic imaging in normal subjects.
    Stuhlmuller JE; Skorton DJ; Burns TL; Melton HE; Vandenberg BF
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 69(5):542-6. PubMed ID: 1736621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cyclic variation of ultrasound backscatter in normal myocardium is view dependent: clinical studies with a real-time backscatter imaging system.
    Vandenberg BF; Rath L; Shoup TA; Kerber RE; Collins SM; Skorton DJ
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1989; 2(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 2629869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiation between acutely ischemic myocardium and zones of completed infarction in dogs on the basis of frequency-dependent backscatter.
    Wear KA; Milunski MR; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Sobel BE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2634-41. PubMed ID: 2663954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High frame rate myocardial integrated backscatter. Does this change our understanding of this acoustic parameter?
    D'hooge J; Bijnens B; Jamal F; Pislaru C; Pislaru S; Thoen J; Suetens P; Van de Werf F; Angermann C; Rademakers FE; Herregods MC; Sutherland GR
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2000 Mar; 1(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 12086215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasonic tissue characterization with a real time integrated backscatter imaging system in normal and aging human hearts.
    Masuyama T; Nellessen U; Schnittger I; Tye TL; Haskell WL; Popp RL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Dec; 14(7):1702-8. PubMed ID: 2685077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anisotropy of the apparent frequency dependence of backscatter in formalin fixed human myocardium.
    Hall CS; Verdonk ED; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):563-8. PubMed ID: 9000744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A relationship between ultrasonic integrated backscatter and myocardial contractile function.
    Wickline SA; Thomas LJ; Miller JG; Sobel BE; Perez JE
    J Clin Invest; 1985 Dec; 76(6):2151-60. PubMed ID: 3908482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.