258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26895467)
1. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography.
Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):2083-108. PubMed ID: 26895467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6480-95. PubMed ID: 21302803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography.
Lazzari B; Belli G; Gori C; Rosselli Del Turco M
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2730-43. PubMed ID: 17821981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the polynomial model against explicit measurements of noise components for different mammography systems.
Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5741-61. PubMed ID: 25198143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
Samei E; Flynn MJ
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise power spectra of images from digital mammography detectors.
Williams MB; Mangiafico PA; Simoni PU
Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1279-93. PubMed ID: 10435530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5219-32. PubMed ID: 19175081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
