424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26895896)
1. Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.
Tan A; Ashrafian H; Scott AJ; Mason SE; Harling L; Athanasiou T; Darzi A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4330-52. PubMed ID: 26895896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.
Xia L; Wang X; Xu T; Guzzo TJ
J Endourol; 2017 Sep; 31(9):893-909. PubMed ID: 27305835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy.
Wang J; Li X; Wu H; Zhang Y; Wang F
Dis Markers; 2020; 2020():2503753. PubMed ID: 32454902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-invasive
Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing surgical performance: the role of robotic surgery in myomectomies, a systematic review and metanalysis.
Mourad A; Kamga-Ngande C; Albaini O; Antaki R
J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):184. PubMed ID: 38683450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis].
Li XM; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 52(3):175-183. PubMed ID: 28355689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma S; Chen Y; Chen Y; Guo T; Yang X; Lu Y; Tian J; Cai H
Asian J Surg; 2019 May; 42(5):589-598. PubMed ID: 30503268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
Galaal K; Bryant A; Fisher AD; Al-Khaduri M; Kew F; Lopes AD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD006655. PubMed ID: 22972096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.
Chang YS; Wang JX; Chang DW
J Surg Res; 2015 May; 195(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 25770742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rondelli F; Bugiantella W; Villa F; Sanguinetti A; Boni M; Mariani E; Avenia N
Int J Surg; 2014; 12 Suppl 2():S153-S159. PubMed ID: 25157988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score-matched study.
Liu R; Liu Q; Zhao ZM; Tan XL; Gao YX; Zhao GD
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):461-469. PubMed ID: 28628713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bochner BH; Dalbagni G; Sjoberg DD; Silberstein J; Keren Paz GE; Donat SM; Coleman JA; Mathew S; Vickers A; Schnorr GC; Feuerstein MA; Rapkin B; Parra RO; Herr HW; Laudone VP
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1042-1050. PubMed ID: 25496767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of robotic colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review.
Renshaw S; Silva IL; Hotouras A; Wexner SD; Murphy J; Bhan C
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Mar; 22(3):161-177. PubMed ID: 29546470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
