255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26895919)
1. Evaluating the effect of distractions in the operating room on clinical decision-making and patient safety.
Murji A; Luketic L; Sobel ML; Kulasegaram KM; Leyland N; Posner G
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4499-504. PubMed ID: 26895919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validating a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.
Shore EM; Grantcharov TP; Husslein H; Shirreff L; Dedy NJ; McDermott CD; Lefebvre GG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):204.e1-204.e11. PubMed ID: 27131588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks.
Goodell KH; Cao CG; Schwaitzberg SD
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2006 Apr; 16(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 16646695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons.
Hsu KE; Man FY; Gizicki RA; Feldman LS; Fried GM
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):196-201. PubMed ID: 17705087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation-Based Testing of Pager Interruptions During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Sujka JA; Safcsak K; Bhullar IS; Havron WS
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(5):1351-1356. PubMed ID: 29396277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training.
Mentis HM; Chellali A; Manser K; Cao CG; Schwaitzberg SD
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1713-24. PubMed ID: 26194261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of validated skills simulation on operating room performance in obstetrics and gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.
Gala R; Orejuela F; Gerten K; Lockrow E; Kilpatrick C; Chohan L; Green C; Vaught J; Goldberg A; Schaffer J
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 121(3):578-584. PubMed ID: 23635621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.
Sevdalis N; Undre S; McDermott J; Giddie J; Diner L; Smith G
World J Surg; 2014 Apr; 38(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 24240670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Traditional Versus Simulation Resident Surgical Laparoscopic Salpingectomy Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Patel NR; Makai GE; Sloan NL; Della Badia CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 26590067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QUIET PLEASE! Effect of distraction on simulated posterior segment surgical performance.
McGowan G; Jawaheer L; Young D; Yorston D
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):519-523. PubMed ID: 29399709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-Simulated Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: Effects of Distraction on Resident Performance.
Cowan JB; Seeley MA; Irwin TA; Caird MS
Orthopedics; 2016; 39(2):e240-5. PubMed ID: 26811955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impaired laparoscopic performance of novice surgeons due to phone call distraction: a single-centre, prospective study.
Yang C; Heinze J; Helmert J; Weitz J; Reissfelder C; Mees ST
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5312-5317. PubMed ID: 28597285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating Robotic Surgical Skills Performance Under Distractive Environment Using Objective and Subjective Measures.
Suh IH; LaGrange CA; Oleynikov D; Siu KC
Surg Innov; 2016 Feb; 23(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 26220676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of potential distractors in the urology operating room.
Lee JY; Lantz AG; McDougall EM; Landman J; Gettman M; Sweet R; Sundaram CP; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1161-5. PubMed ID: 23691940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative Practice Paired With Instructor Feedback May Not Improve Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents' Operative Performance.
Kroft J; Ordon M; Po L; Zwingerman N; Waters K; Lee JY; Pittini R
J Grad Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 9(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 28439352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills: dual-task approach.
Meneghetti AT; Pachev G; Zheng B; Panton ON; Qayumi K
Surg Innov; 2012 Dec; 19(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 22170894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of lightly embalmed (fresh tissue) cadavers for resident laparoscopic training.
Levine RL; Kives S; Cathey G; Blinchevsky A; Acland R; Thompson C; Pasic R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 16962531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gynecological laparoscopy in residency training program: Dutch perspectives.
Kolkman W; Wolterbeek R; Jansen FW
Surg Endosc; 2005 Nov; 19(11):1498-502. PubMed ID: 16206008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of distractions on operative performance and ability to multitask--a case for deliberate practice.
Ahmed A; Ahmad M; Stewart CM; Francis HW; Bhatti NI
Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):837-41. PubMed ID: 25073874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of skill level between trainees and community orthopaedic surgeons using a virtual reality arthroscopic knee simulator.
Cannon WD; Nicandri GT; Reinig K; Mevis H; Wittstein J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):e57. PubMed ID: 24695934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
