171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26898056)
1. Caliper vs. Lipometer--Comparing Two Methods of Subcutaneous Body Fat Measurement by Bland-Altman Diagrams.
Tafeit E; Kaimbacher PS; Wallner-Liebmann SJ; Reibnegger G; Cvirn G; Jürimäe J; Saar M; Maestu J; Purge P; Lätt E; Jürimäe T
Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):611-5. PubMed ID: 26898056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationships between bioelectric impedance and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness measured by LIPOMETER and skinfold calipers in children.
Jürimäe T; Sudi K; Payerl D; Leppik A; Jürimäe J; Müller R; Tafeit E
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Sep; 90(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 14504951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating DXA total body fat percentage by lipometer subcutaneous adipose tissue thicknesses.
Tafeit E; Greilberger J; Cvirn G; Lipp RW; Schnedl WJ; Jürimäe T; Jürimäe J; Wallner-Liebmann SJ
Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19662755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between body fat measured by DXA and subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness measured by Lipometer in adults.
Jürimäe T; Jürimäe J; Wallner SJ; Lipp RW; Schnedl WJ; Möller R; Tafeit E
J Physiol Anthropol; 2007 Jun; 26(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 17704631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing subcutaneous adipose tissue by simple and portable field instruments: Skinfolds versus A-mode ultrasound measurements.
Pérez-Chirinos Buxadé C; Solà-Perez T; Castizo-Olier J; Carrasco-Marginet M; Roy A; Marfell-Jones M; Irurtia A
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205226. PubMed ID: 30496211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of body fat by skinfold caliper: assumptions and cadaver evidence.
Martin AD; Ross WD; Drinkwater DT; Clarys JP
Int J Obes; 1985; 9 Suppl 1():31-9. PubMed ID: 4066123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonic assessment of body composition in obese adults: overcoming the limitations of the skinfold caliper.
Kuczmarski RJ; Fanelli MT; Koch GG
Am J Clin Nutr; 1987 Apr; 45(4):717-24. PubMed ID: 3565298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subcutaneous adipose tissue topography (SAT-Top) development in children and young adults.
Tafeit E; Möller R; Jurimae T; Sudi K; Wallner SJ
Coll Antropol; 2007 Jun; 31(2):395-402. PubMed ID: 17847915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The determination of subcutaneous body fat percentage by measuring skinfold thickness in teenagers in Turkey.
Kavak V
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab; 2006 Jun; 16(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 16948485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound as an approach to assessing body composition.
Fanelli MT; Kuczmarski RJ
Am J Clin Nutr; 1984 May; 39(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 6711473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suprailiac or abdominal skinfold thickness measured with a skinfold caliper as a predictor of body density in Japanese adults.
Demura S; Sato S
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2007 Sep; 213(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17785953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of optical device lipometer and bioelectric impedance analysis for body fat assessment in men and women.
Jürimäe T; Sudi K; Jürimäe J; Payerl D; Möller R; Tafeit E
Coll Antropol; 2005 Dec; 29(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 16417151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decrease of total subcutaneous adipose tissue from infancy to childhood.
Kaimbacher PS; Dunitz-Scheer M; Wallner-Liebmann SJ; Scheer PJ; Sudi K; Schnedl WJ; Tafeit E
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2011 Nov; 53(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 21694636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness with high frequency pulsed ultrasound: comparisons with a caliper and a radiographic technique.
Black D; Vora J; Hayward M; Marks R
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 3282753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
