BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26898068)

  • 1. Impact of Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy on Disease Progression and Adjuvant Treatment in Pathologically Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Tomasković I; Milicić V; Tomić M; Ruzić B; Ulamec M
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):697-700. PubMed ID: 26898068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
    Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer.
    Ceylan C; Tonyali S; Keles I
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 32(10):514-517. PubMed ID: 27742035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.
    Aoun F; Albisinni S; Henriet B; Tombal B; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
    Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When Should a Positive Surgical Margin Ring a Bell? An Analysis of a Multi-Institutional Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Database.
    Abdollah F; Moschini M; Sood A; Sammon J; Dalela D; Hsu L; Beyer B; Haese A; Graefen M; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Menon M
    J Endourol; 2016 Feb; 30(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 26415003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Song C; Kang T; Yoo S; Jeong IG; Ro JY; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 21719325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
    O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.
    Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer.
    Valicenti RK; Chervoneva I; Gomella LG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15001249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
    Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
    Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Gleason pattern 5 including tertiary pattern 5 on outcomes of salvage treatment for biochemical recurrence in pT2-3N0M0 prostate cancer.
    Taguchi S; Shiraishi K; Fukuhara H; Nakagawa K; Morikawa T; Naito A; Kakutani S; Takeshima Y; Miyazaki H; Nakagawa T; Fujimura T; Kume H; Homma Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 21(5):975-980. PubMed ID: 27098807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ginzburg S; Nevers T; Staff I; Tortora J; Champagne A; Kesler SS; Laudone VP; Wagner JR
    JSLS; 2012; 16(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23318071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.