These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26898085)

  • 21. Comparison between visual and instrumental methods for natural tooth shade matching.
    Pimental W; Tiossi R
    Gen Dent; 2014; 62(6):47-9. PubMed ID: 25369386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tooth Shade-Matching Ability Between Groups of Students with Different Color Knowledge.
    Pohlen B; Hawlina M; Šober K; Kopač I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 27611754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the efficiency of photography-assisted shade selection to visual shade selection.
    Prabhu K; Ariga P; Philip JM
    Gen Dent; 2013 Jul; 61(4):19-23. PubMed ID: 23823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Satisfaction of Dental Students, Faculty, and Patients with Tooth Shade-Matching Using a Spectrophotometer.
    Ballard E; Metz MJ; Harris BT; Metz CJ; Chou JC; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Dent Educ; 2017 May; 81(5):545-553. PubMed ID: 28461631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection.
    Özat PB; Tuncel İ; Eroğlu E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Dec; 40(12):958-64. PubMed ID: 24127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison between visual, digital photography and polarizing filter photography for shade selection.
    Kelkar KC; Dogra ES; Bhat V; Prasad DK; Hegde C
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(5):712-717. PubMed ID: 33433508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of a smartphone-based software application as a potential digital tool in tooth shade selection: a prospective clinical study.
    Raza FB; Kumar VA; Jacob A; Ali A
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Jun; 52(7):608-617. PubMed ID: 33688711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spectrophotometric analysis of tooth color reproduction on anterior all-ceramic crowns: Part 1: analysis and interpretation of tooth color.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Yoshida A; Da Silva JD; Miller L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Feb; 22(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 20136946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review.
    Vichi A; Louca C; Corciolani G; Ferrari M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Jan; 27(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 21122905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accurate shade image matching by using a smartphone camera.
    Tam WK; Lee HJ
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 27553123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of time consumption and color matching results of different dental occupational groups.
    Ortolan SM; Persic S; Celebic A; Mehulic K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 23998147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lightness, chroma and hue differences on visual shade matching.
    Pecho OE; Pérez MM; Ghinea R; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Nov; 32(11):1362-1373. PubMed ID: 27614615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.
    Paravina RD; Johnston WM; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):276-83; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 17877628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [In vivo model to evaluate the accuracy of complete-tooth spectrophotometer for dental clinics].
    Liu F; Yang J; Xu TK; Xu MM; Ma Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 21426779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of a digital technique in evaluating the reliability of shade guides.
    Cal E; Sonugelen M; Guneri P; Kesercioglu A; Kose T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 15140175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The choice of color in fixed prosthetics: what steps should be followed for a reliable outcome?].
    Vanheusden A; Mainjot A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2004; 59(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 15295939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Shade-Matching Performance Using a New Light-Correcting Device.
    Gasparik C; Grecu AG; Culic B; Badea ME; Dudea D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 26031548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tooth shade selection using a colorimetric instrument compared with that using a conventional shade guide.
    Kuzmanović D; Lyons KM
    N Z Dent J; 2009 Dec; 105(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 20000193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.