481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26898895)
1. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical outcome for robotic-assisted single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) in female-to male reassignment compared to its use in benign gynecological disease: a single center experience.
Gardella B; Dominoni M; Bogliolo S; Spinillo A
J Robot Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):579-584. PubMed ID: 32880794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review of strategies and factors to maximize cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomies and myomectomies in benign gynecological disease.
Wu CZ; Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2019 Oct; 13(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30919259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-site robotic total hysterectomy: standardization of technique and surgical outcomes.
Sendag F; Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozdemir A; Gunusen I; Oztekin MK
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 24530696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curve of surgical parameters for robotic hysterectomy: a comparison between multiport versus single-site.
Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Musacchi V; Stracquadaini M; Bogliolo S; Scudeller L; Spinillo A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):954-961. PubMed ID: 35225752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total Laparoscopic (S-LPS) versus TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy: A Case-Control Study.
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Costantini B; Monterossi G; Cappuccio S; Perrone E; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 27247263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
