These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26900006)

  • 1. Synthetic Biology R&D Risks: Social-Institutional Contexts Matter!
    Wolfe AK; Campa MF; Bergmann RA; Stelling SC; Bjornstad DJ; Shumpert BL
    Trends Biotechnol; 2016 May; 34(5):353-356. PubMed ID: 26900006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthetic Biology: Reports from CSHA 2016 and More.
    You L; Takano E
    Biotechnol J; 2018 May; 13(5):e1800160. PubMed ID: 29733546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies.
    Karabin J; Mansfield I; Frow EK
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257327. PubMed ID: 34534242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Co-evolution of physical and social sciences in synthetic biology.
    Trump BD; Cegan J; Wells E; Poinsatte-Jones K; Rycroft T; Warner C; Martin D; Perkins E; Wood MD; Linkov I
    Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2019 May; 39(3):351-365. PubMed ID: 30727764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective Technology Assessment of Synthetic Biology: Fundamental and Propaedeutic Reflections in Order to Enable an Early Assessment.
    Schmidt JC
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1151-1170. PubMed ID: 26160061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creating parts that allow for rational design: synthetic biology and the problem of context-sensitivity.
    Güttinger S
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Jun; 44(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 23578488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Context, existing frameworks, and practicality: moving forward with synthetic biology.
    Carter SR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(6 Spec no.):S46-8. PubMed ID: 25418707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2016.
    Schreiber F; Bader GD; Gleeson P; Golebiewski M; Hucka M; Le Novère N; Myers C; Nickerson D; Sommer B; Walthemath D
    J Integr Bioinform; 2016 Dec; 13(3):289. PubMed ID: 28187405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2017.
    Schreiber F; Bader GD; Gleeson P; Golebiewski M; Hucka M; Keating SM; Novère NL; Myers C; Nickerson D; Sommer B; Waltemath D
    J Integr Bioinform; 2018 Mar; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 29596055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basic science through engineering? Synthetic modeling and the idea of biology-inspired engineering.
    Knuuttila T; Loettgers A
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Jun; 44(2):158-69. PubMed ID: 23602394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time to settle the synthetic controversy.
    ter Meulen V
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7499):135. PubMed ID: 24805310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enabling a next generation of synthetic biology community organization and leadership.
    Palmer MJ; Jewett MC
    ACS Synth Biol; 2014 Mar; 3(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 24617412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Synthetic biology called to order.
    Check Hayden E
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7546):141-2. PubMed ID: 25855435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fusion of biology, computer science, and engineering: towards efficient and successful synthetic biology.
    Linshiz G; Goldberg A; Konry T; Hillson NJ
    Perspect Biol Med; 2012; 55(4):503-20. PubMed ID: 23502561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthetic Biology: opportunities for Chilean bioindustry and education.
    Federici F; Rudge TJ; Pollak B; Haseloff J; Gutiérrez RA
    Biol Res; 2013; 46(4):383-93. PubMed ID: 24510141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. iGEM 2.0--refoundations for engineering biology.
    Vilanova C; Porcar M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2014 May; 32(5):420-4. PubMed ID: 24811510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment of Synthetic Biology.
    Epstein MM; Vermeire T
    Trends Biotechnol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):601-603. PubMed ID: 27234301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Governance strategies for living technologies: bridging the gap between stimulating and regulating technoscience.
    van Est R; Stemerding D
    Artif Life; 2013; 19(3-4):437-50. PubMed ID: 23834596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive Constraints Shape Public Debate on the Risks of Synthetic Biology.
    Swiney L; Bates DG; Coley JD
    Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):1199-1201. PubMed ID: 30309676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synthetic biology: Beyond divisions.
    Nature; 2014 May; 509(7499):151. PubMed ID: 24805327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.