168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26900809)
1. A Primer on Bayesian Decision Analysis With an Application to a Kidney Transplant Decision.
Neapolitan R; Jiang X; Ladner DP; Kaplan B
Transplantation; 2016 Mar; 100(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 26900809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Accepting Kidneys of Varying Quality for Transplantation or Expedited Placement With Decision Trees.
Kilambi V; Bui K; Hazen GB; Friedewald JJ; Ladner DP; Kaplan B; Mehrotra S
Transplantation; 2019 May; 103(5):980-989. PubMed ID: 30720682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a Clinical Decision Support System for Living Kidney Donor Assessment Based on National Guidelines.
Knight SR; Cao KN; South M; Hayward N; Hunter JP; Fox J
Transplantation; 2018 Oct; 102(10):e447-e453. PubMed ID: 30028418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tutorial of the probabilistic methods Bayesian networks and influence diagrams applied to medicine.
Nistal-Nuño B
J Evid Based Med; 2018 May; 11(2):112-124. PubMed ID: 29878581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival and Quality of Life Impact of a Risk-based Allocation Algorithm for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.
Calisa V; Craig JC; Howard K; Howell M; Alexander S; Chadban SJ; Clayton P; Lim WH; Kanellis J; Wyburn K; Johnson DW; McDonald SP; Opdam H; Chapman JR; Yang J; Wong G
Transplantation; 2018 Sep; 102(9):1530-1537. PubMed ID: 29485512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nephrologists' Perspectives on Recipient Eligibility and Access to Living Kidney Donor Transplantation.
Hanson CS; Chadban SJ; Chapman JR; Craig JC; Wong G; Tong A
Transplantation; 2016 Apr; 100(4):943-53. PubMed ID: 26425873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical decision support systems at the Vienna General Hospital using Arden Syntax: Design, implementation, and integration.
Schuh C; de Bruin JS; Seeling W
Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():24-33. PubMed ID: 26706047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of multivariate probabilistic (Bayesian) networks to substance use disorder risk stratification and cost estimation.
Weinstein L; Radano TA; Jack T; Kalina P; Eberhardt JS
Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2009 Sep; 6(Fall):1b. PubMed ID: 20169014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric deceased donor renal transplantation: An approach to decision making II. Acceptability of a deceased donor kidney for a child, a snap decision at 3 AM.
Chaudhuri A; Gallo A; Grimm P
Pediatr Transplant; 2015 Nov; 19(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 26426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four years of experience with the Australian kidney paired donation programme.
Cantwell L; Woodroffe C; Holdsworth R; Ferrari P
Nephrology (Carlton); 2015 Mar; 20(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 25408125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of a prognostic model for kidney function 1 year after combined pancreas and kidney transplantation using pre-transplant donor and recipient variables.
Zorn KS; Littbarski S; Schwager Y; Kaltenborn A; Beneke J; Gwiasda J; Becker T; Braun F; Reichert B; Klempnauer J; Schrem H
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):837-849. PubMed ID: 30338375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning in predicting graft failure following kidney transplantation: A systematic review of published predictive models.
Senanayake S; White N; Graves N; Healy H; Baboolal K; Kularatna S
Int J Med Inform; 2019 Oct; 130():103957. PubMed ID: 31472443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining the Level of Importance of Variables in Predicting Kidney Transplant Survival Based on a Novel Ranking Method.
Taherkhani N; Sepehri MM; Khasha R; Shafaghi S
Transplantation; 2021 Oct; 105(10):2307-2315. PubMed ID: 33534528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital patient models based on Bayesian networks for clinical treatment decision support.
Cypko MA; Stoehr M
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Apr; 28(2):105-119. PubMed ID: 30810428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confident interpretation of Bayesian decision tree ensembles for clinical applications.
Schetinin V; Fieldsend JE; Partridge D; Coats TJ; Krzanowski WJ; Everson RM; Bailey TC; Hernandez A
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2007 May; 11(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 17521081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why do not all living kidney donor candidates proceed to donation?
Cash E; Graver A; Kuo S; Kirkland G; Hughes P; Robertson A; Jose MD
Intern Med J; 2019 Mar; 49(3):384-387. PubMed ID: 30897662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personalized treatment planning with a model of radiation therapy outcomes for use in multiobjective optimization of IMRT plans for prostate cancer.
Smith WP; Kim M; Holdsworth C; Liao J; Phillips MH
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():38. PubMed ID: 26968687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience in Developing an FHIR Medical Data Management Platform to Provide Clinical Decision Support.
Semenov I; Osenev R; Gerasimov S; Kopanitsa G; Denisov D; Andreychuk Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 31861851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
