293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26900904)
1. Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness by Use of the Combination of Quantitative DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
Hötker AM; Mazaheri Y; Aras Ö; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Gondo T; Matsumoto K; Hricak H; Akin O
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 26900904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis.
Oto A; Yang C; Kayhan A; Tretiakova M; Antic T; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Karczmar GS; Stadler WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90. PubMed ID: 22109293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of ADC, T2 signal intensity, and a combination of both parameters to assess Gleason score and primary Gleason grades in patients with known prostate cancer.
Nowak J; Malzahn U; Baur AD; Reichelt U; Franiel T; Hamm B; Durmus T
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 25505225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: combined apparent diffusion coefficient, metabolite ratio, and vascular parameters.
Riches SF; Payne GS; Morgan VA; Sandhu S; Fisher C; Germuska M; Collins DJ; Thompson A; deSouza NM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1583-91. PubMed ID: 19933651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Li C; Chen M; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang W; Zhang C
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 27055916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using apparent diffusion coefficient values: impact of patient race and age.
Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1744-1751. PubMed ID: 28161826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate Cancer: Utility of Whole-Lesion Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Metrics for Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Ream JM; Nolan P; Rusinek H; Deng FM; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1208-14. PubMed ID: 26587927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study.
Peng Y; Jiang Y; Yang C; Brown JB; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Giger ML; Eggener SE; Oto A
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):787-96. PubMed ID: 23392430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-invasive estimation of prostate cancer aggressiveness using diffusion-weighted MRI and 3D proton MR spectroscopy at 3.0 T.
Thörmer G; Otto J; Horn LC; Garnov N; Do M; Franz T; Stolzenburg JU; Moche M; Kahn T; Busse H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24504488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer at 3T.
Fukunaga T; Tamada T; Kanomata N; Takeuchi M; Ueda Y; Miyaji Y; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Sone T
Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Nov; 83():152-159. PubMed ID: 34454006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Donati OF; Mazaheri Y; Afaq A; Vargas HA; Zheng J; Moskowitz CS; Hricak H; Akin O
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 24475824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Washout gradient in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is associated with tumor aggressiveness of prostate cancer.
Chen YJ; Chu WC; Pu YS; Chueh SC; Shun CT; Tseng WY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Oct; 36(4):912-9. PubMed ID: 22711415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. T2-weighted MRI-derived textural features reflect prostate cancer aggressiveness: preliminary results.
Nketiah G; Elschot M; Kim E; Teruel JR; Scheenen TW; Bathen TF; Selnæs KM
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):3050-3059. PubMed ID: 27975146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
Kato S; Kamijima S; Inaoka T; Kamiya N; Sasai D; Terada H; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29939084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
