173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26901264)
1. The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.
Sheffield SW; Simha M; Jahn KN; Gifford RH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 26901264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bimodal Hearing with Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth.
Gifford RH; Sunderhaus L; Sheffield S
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10S):S19-S25. PubMed ID: 34766940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The benefits of bimodal hearing: effect of frequency region and acoustic bandwidth.
Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(3):151-63. PubMed ID: 24556850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth.
D'Onofrio KL; Gifford RH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 64(4):1341-1353. PubMed ID: 33784471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency Following Response and Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.
Kessler DM; Ananthakrishnan S; Smith SB; D'Onofrio K; Gifford RH
Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520902001. PubMed ID: 32003296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
Sheffield SW; Haynes DS; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25751696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.
Gifford RH; Loiselle L; Natale S; Sheffield SW; Sunderhaus LW; S Dietrich M; Dorman MF
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1306-1321. PubMed ID: 29800361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.
Fowler JR; Eggleston JL; Reavis KM; McMillan GP; Reiss LA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 26535803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Application of Spectral Modulation Detection: Speech Recognition Benefit for Combining a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.
Kessler DM; Wolfe J; Blanchard M; Gifford RH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1561-1571. PubMed ID: 32379527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
