These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26901264)

  • 21. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does acoustic fundamental frequency information enhance cochlear implant performance?
    Mulhern L; Cullington H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24597637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
    Park LR; Teagle HF; Buss E; Roush PA; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e1-e12. PubMed ID: 22531574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Objective discrimination of bimodal speech using frequency following responses.
    Xu C; Cheng FY; Medina S; Eng E; Gifford R; Smith S
    Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108853. PubMed ID: 37441879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Zhang T; Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 19915474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Whitaker G; Lee YS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):521-527. PubMed ID: 34965598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Hu Y; Tahmina Q; Runge C; Friedland DR
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 24265213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Dwyer NY;
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):845-862. PubMed ID: 29373326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
    Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
    Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contribution of low-frequency acoustic information to Chinese speech recognition in cochlear implant simulations.
    Luo X; Fu QJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2260-6. PubMed ID: 17069321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bilaterally Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing in Mandarin-Speaking Listeners: The Population With Poor Residual Hearing.
    Tao DD; Liu JS; Yang ZD; Wilson BS; Zhou N
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518757892. PubMed ID: 29451107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid.
    Illg A; Bojanowicz M; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Büchner A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e240-4. PubMed ID: 25058838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interactions Between Slopes of Residual Hearing and Frequency Maps in Simulated Bimodal and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Straw S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 67(1):282-295. PubMed ID: 38092067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation.
    van Loon MC; Smits C; Smit CF; Hensen EF; Merkus P
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e100-e106. PubMed ID: 28441230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.