These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26901571)

  • 1. Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.
    Primativo S; Reilly J; Crutch SJ
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41(3):659-685. PubMed ID: 26901571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abstract conceptual feature ratings: the role of emotion, magnitude, and other cognitive domains in the organization of abstract conceptual knowledge.
    Crutch SJ; Troche J; Reilly J; Ridgway GR
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():186. PubMed ID: 23720617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of the visual-world paradigm.
    Shen W; Qu Q; Li X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26993126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of polarity in antonym and synonym conceptual knowledge: evidence from stroke aphasia and multidimensional ratings of abstract words.
    Crutch SJ; Williams P; Ridgway GR; Borgenicht L
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Sep; 50(11):2636-44. PubMed ID: 22820631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic word priming in the absence of eye fixations: relative contributions of overt and covert attention.
    Calvo MG; Castillo MD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 19145009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.
    Huettig F; Altmann GT
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B23-32. PubMed ID: 15833303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthographic versus semantic matching in visual search for words within lists.
    Léger L; Rouet JF; Ros C; Vibert N
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 22148903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of crowding on eye movement patterns in reading.
    Bricolo E; Salvi C; Martelli M; Arduino LS; Daini R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():23-34. PubMed ID: 26143298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.
    Hohenstein S; Laubrock J; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1150-70. PubMed ID: 20804291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):662-77. PubMed ID: 23088508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: evidence from the visual-world paradigm.
    Duñabeitia JA; Avilés A; Afonso O; Scheepers C; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 19110239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition.
    Mirman D; Magnuson JS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):1026-39. PubMed ID: 19744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: evidence from reading English and French.
    Pynte J; Kennedy A
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3786-801. PubMed ID: 16938333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual letter similarity effects during sentence reading: Evidence from the boundary technique.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():142-149. PubMed ID: 30119047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words.
    Vergilino-Perez D; Collins T; Doré-Mazars K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(17):2009-17. PubMed ID: 15149834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.