These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26902247)

  • 1. Object-based selection is contingent on attentional control settings.
    Taylor JE; Rajsic J; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):988-95. PubMed ID: 26902247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Object width modulates object-based attentional selection.
    Nah JC; Neppi-Modona M; Strother L; Behrmann M; Shomstein S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1375-1389. PubMed ID: 29691762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time course of the contingent spatial blink.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture.
    Wu SC; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1050-67. PubMed ID: 14585022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capturing attention is not that simple: different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1703-14. PubMed ID: 24037596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS; Weissman DH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience.
    Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attending to illusory differences in object size.
    Jefferies LN; Gmeindl L; Yantis S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jul; 76(5):1393-402. PubMed ID: 24696380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal involvement of visual area MT in global feature-based enhancement but not contingent attentional capture.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2015 Sep; 118():90-102. PubMed ID: 26067347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings.
    Glickman M; Lamy D
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):303-314. PubMed ID: 28281398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Out of control: attentional selection for orientation is thwarted by properties of the underlying neural mechanisms.
    Du F; Abrams RA
    Cognition; 2012 Sep; 124(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 22703889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture.
    Munneke J; Fahrenfort JJ; Sutterer D; Theeuwes J; Awh E
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117562. PubMed ID: 33189931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.