These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26902543)

  • 1. Design and cognitive evaluation of 6 dynamic lane departure warning symbols.
    Maddahi H; Pouyakian M; Tabatabai Ghomsheh F; Piri L; Osqueizadeh R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):842-7. PubMed ID: 26902543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of false warnings on partial and full lane departure warnings effectiveness and acceptance in car driving.
    Navarro J; Yousfi E; Deniel J; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1553-1564. PubMed ID: 26916010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the impact of advanced driver assistance systems on driving distraction and risky behaviour: An empirical analysis of irish commercial drivers.
    Masello L; Sheehan B; Castignani G; Shannon D; Murphy F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106969. PubMed ID: 36696744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Residual road departure crashes after full deployment of LDW and LDP systems.
    Riexinger LE; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S177-S181. PubMed ID: 31381442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age and gender differences in time to collision at braking from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Montgomery J; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S15-20. PubMed ID: 25307380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and steering behaviours during lane departures: a longitudinal study of interactions between lane departure warning system, driving task and driving experience.
    Navarro J; Reynaud E; Pelerin M; Ouimet MC; Gabaude C; Schnebelen D
    Ergonomics; 2024 Jan; 67(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 37074777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems.
    Navarro J; Mars F; Hoc JM
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):950-60. PubMed ID: 17915609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors.
    Navarro J; Deniel J; Yousfi E; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):123-131. PubMed ID: 27890120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():25-36. PubMed ID: 29885725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring relationships between observed activation rates and functional attributes of lane departure prevention.
    Reagan IJ; Cicchino JB; Montalbano CJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(4):424-430. PubMed ID: 31074631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.