BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26902679)

  • 1. Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T
    Lee YH; Hahn S; Kim E; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 15(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 26902679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 24925839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) for reducing metallic artifacts in 3-T MRI.
    Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):703-6. PubMed ID: 23290476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Short-Tau Inversion Recovery With Short-Tau Inversion Recovery-Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction for Spine Imaging at 1.5 T in the Setting of Metallic Implants.
    Yang JY; Hsieh TJ; Chen CK; Lin CH; Chou YC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 47(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 37707413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compressed Sensing SEMAC: 8-fold Accelerated High Resolution Metal Artifact Reduction MRI of Cobalt-Chromium Knee Arthroplasty Implants.
    Fritz J; Ahlawat S; Demehri S; Thawait GK; Raithel E; Gilson WD; Nittka M
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):666-76. PubMed ID: 27518214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spine MR images in patients with pedicle screw fixation: Comparison of conventional and SEMAC-VAT sequences at 1.5 T.
    Park C; Lee E; Yeo Y; Kang Y; Lee JW; Ahn JM; Kang HS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 54():63-70. PubMed ID: 30099060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total knee arthroplasty MRI featuring slice-encoding for metal artifact correction: reduction of artifacts for STIR and proton density-weighted sequences.
    Sutter R; Hodek R; Fucentese SF; Nittka M; Pfirrmann CW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1315-24. PubMed ID: 24261373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved Visualization of Juxtaprosthetic Tissue Using Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Experimental and Clinical Optimization of Compressed Sensing SEMAC.
    Jungmann PM; Bensler S; Zingg P; Fritz B; Pfirrmann CW; Sutter R
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 30351283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. View-Angle Tilting and Slice-Encoding Metal Artifact Correction for Artifact Reduction in MRI: Experimental Sequence Optimization for Orthopaedic Tumor Endoprostheses and Clinical Application.
    Jungmann PM; Ganter C; Schaeffeler CJ; Bauer JS; Baum T; Meier R; Nittka M; Pohlig F; Rechl H; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124922. PubMed ID: 25909472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MSVAT-SPACE-STIR and SEMAC-STIR for Reduction of Metallic Artifacts in 3T Head and Neck MRI.
    Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Schwindling FS; Nittka M; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Juerchott A
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Jul; 39(7):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 29794233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced metal artifact reduction MRI of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants: compressed sensing acceleration enables the time-neutral use of SEMAC.
    Fritz J; Fritz B; Thawait GK; Raithel E; Gilson WD; Nittka M; Mont MA
    Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1345-56. PubMed ID: 27497594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging.
    Sutter R; Ulbrich EJ; Jellus V; Nittka M; Pfirrmann CW
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):204-14. PubMed ID: 22923720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating Compressed SENSE (CS) MRI Metal Artifact Reduction Using Pig L-Spine Phantom and Transplant Patients: Focused on the CS-SEMAC (SPIR), mDixon(O-MAR) and STIR Techniques.
    Goo EH; Kim SS
    Tomography; 2022 Sep; 8(5):2298-2312. PubMed ID: 36136888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of Scan Time in MRI for Total Hip Prostheses: SEMAC Tailoring for Prosthetic Implants Containing Different Types of Metals.
    Deligianni X; Bieri O; Elke R; Wischer T; Egelhof T
    Rofo; 2015 Dec; 187(12):1116-22. PubMed ID: 26327671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrument visualization using conventional and compressed sensing SEMAC for interventional MRI at 3T.
    Sonnow L; Gilson WD; Raithel E; Nittka M; Wacker F; Fritz J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1306-1315. PubMed ID: 28940951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing metallic artefacts in post-operative spinal imaging: slice encoding for metal artefact correction with dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation MRI at 3.0 T.
    Song KD; Yoon YC; Park J
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20120524. PubMed ID: 23719085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging.
    Molière S; Dillenseger JP; Ehlinger M; Kremer S; Bierry G
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Sep; 46(9):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 28540521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro assessment of knee MRI in the presence of metal implants comparing MAVRIC-SL and conventional fast spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T field strength.
    Liebl H; Heilmeier U; Lee S; Nardo L; Patsch J; Schuppert C; Han M; Rondak IC; Banerjee S; Koch K; Link TM; Krug R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 41(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 24912802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New-Generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction: First In Vitro Experience at 0.55 T and Comparison With 1.5 T.
    Khodarahmi I; Brinkmann IM; Lin DJ; Bruno M; Johnson PM; Knoll F; Keerthivasan MB; Chandarana H; Fritz J
    Invest Radiol; 2022 Aug; 57(8):517-526. PubMed ID: 35239614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.