171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26903428)
41. Clinical profile of Implanon: a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant.
Croxatto HB
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2000 Sep; 5 Suppl 2():21-8. PubMed ID: 11246604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Early removal of etonogestrel subcutaneous contraceptive implant at a community health centre in Pretoria.
Moeti DMP; Govender I; Bongongo T
S Afr Fam Pract (2004); 2022 Jul; 64(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 35924618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Tamoxifen for the Treatment of Etonogestrel Implant-Associated Bleeding in an Adolescent Gynecology Practice.
Friedman JC; Buyers E; Laurin J; Hampanda K; Alaniz VI
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 35(3):341-345. PubMed ID: 34780932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Continuation rates and reasons for removal among Implanon users accessing two family planning clinics in Queensland, Australia.
Harvey C; Seib C; Lucke J
Contraception; 2009 Dec; 80(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 19913146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of one-rod etonogestrel and two-rod levonorgestrel contraceptive implants with nonrandomized copper-IUD controls: methodology and insertion data.
Meirik O; Brache V; Orawan K; Habib NA; Schmidt J; Ortayli N; Culwell K; Jackson E; Ali M;
Contraception; 2013 Jan; 87(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 23063337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Satisfaction, early removal, and side effects associated with long-acting reversible contraception.
Dickerson LM; Diaz VA; Jordon J; Davis E; Chirina S; Goddard JA; Carr KB; Carek PJ
Fam Med; 2013; 45(10):701-7. PubMed ID: 24347187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference?
Tocce KM; Sheeder JL; Teal SB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):481.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22631865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Safety, efficacy and acceptability of implanon a single rod implantable contraceptive (etonogestrel) in University of Benin Teaching Hospital.
Aisien AO; Enosolease ME
Niger J Clin Pract; 2010 Sep; 13(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 20857796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Etonogestrel contraceptive implant-associated secondary anorgasmia.
Chapa HO; Ramirez A; Dawson D
Contraception; 2017 Oct; 96(4):254-256. PubMed ID: 28666796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. "I think it depends on the body, with mine it didn't work": explaining young women's contraceptive implant removal.
Hoggart L; Newton VL; Dickson J
Contraception; 2013 Nov; 88(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 23829976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Australian women's experience with Implanon.
Weisberg E; Fraser I
Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Aug; 34(8):694-6. PubMed ID: 16113711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bleeding profile in users of an etonogestrel sub-dermal implant: effects of anthropometric variables. An observational uncontrolled preliminary study in Italian population.
Di Carlo C; Guida M; De Rosa N; Sansone A; Gargano V; Cagnacci A; Nappi C
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015 Jun; 31(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 26213863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. One-year assessment of women receiving sub-dermal contraceptive implant at Siriraj Family Planning Clinic.
Thamkhantho M; Jivasak-Apimas S; Angsuwathana S; Chiravacharadej G; Intawong J
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91(6):775-80. PubMed ID: 18697372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Five years' experience with a small intracervical/intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing device.
Pakarinen P; Luukkainen T
Contraception; 2005 Nov; 72(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 16246659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Copper-7 intrauterine device (Gravigard). Report of experience].
Jürgensen O; Stenzel I; Wirth A; Sina D; Taubert HD
Fortschr Med; 1976 Mar; 94(9):515-21. PubMed ID: 964914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Insertion problems, removal problems, and contraception failures with Implanon].
Bensouda-Grimaldi L; Jonville-Béra AP; Beau-Salinas F; Llabres S; Autret-Leca E;
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Dec; 33(12):986-90. PubMed ID: 16321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Continuation rates of Implanon in the UK: data from an observational study in a clinical setting.
Lakha F; Glasier AF
Contraception; 2006 Oct; 74(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 16982226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Assessing Weight Status in Adolescent and Young Adult Users of the Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant.
Romano ME; Braun-Courville DK
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 32(4):409-414. PubMed ID: 30928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
