These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26903496)

  • 1. Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes.
    Reinagel A; Bray Speth E
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(1):ar4. PubMed ID: 26903496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Introductory biology students' conceptual models and explanations of the origin of variation.
    Speth EB; Shaw N; Momsen J; Reinagel A; Le P; Taqieddin R; Long T
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(3):529-39. PubMed ID: 25185235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The molecular biology capstone assessment: a concept assessment for upper-division molecular biology students.
    Couch BA; Wood WB; Knight JK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015 Mar; 14(1):ar10. PubMed ID: 25713098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a novel group-centered testing schema in an upper-level undergraduate molecular biotechnology course.
    Srougi MC; Miller HB; Witherow DS; Carson S
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2013; 41(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 23868378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Greatest Learning Return on Your Pedagogical Investment: Alignment, Assessment or In-Class Instruction?
    Holt EA; Young C; Keetch J; Larsen S; Mollner B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137446. PubMed ID: 26340659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Dental Student-Developed Exam Questions and Learning at Higher Cognitive Levels.
    Gonzalez-Cabezas C; Anderson OS; Wright MC; Fontana M
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1295-304. PubMed ID: 26522634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Assessment of Modules to Integrate Quantitative Skills in Introductory Biology Courses.
    Hoffman K; Leupen S; Dowell K; Kephart K; Leips J
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 27146161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A workshop series using peer-grading to build drug information, writing, critical-thinking, and constructive feedback skills.
    Davis LE
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(10):191. PubMed ID: 25657378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of discovery learning in a lower-division biology course.
    Wilke RR; Straits WJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2001 Dec; 25(1-4):134-41. PubMed ID: 11824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weekly Formative Exams and Creative Grading Enhance Student Learning in an Introductory Biology Course.
    Bailey EG; Jensen J; Nelson J; Wiberg HK; Bell JD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28130269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating quantitative thinking into an introductory biology course improves students' mathematical reasoning in biological contexts.
    Hester S; Buxner S; Elfring L; Nagy L
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 24591504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of the peer-led team-learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory.
    Snyder JJ; Carter BE; Wiles JR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015 Mar; 14(1):ar2. PubMed ID: 25673354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of a zebrafish research project into a molecular biology course to support critical thinking and course content goals.
    Felzien LK
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016 Nov; 44(6):565-573. PubMed ID: 27229632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward university modeling instruction--biology: adapting curricular frameworks from physics to biology.
    Manthey S; Brewe E
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013 Jun; 12(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 23737628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
    Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer led team learning in introductory biology: effects on peer leader critical thinking skills.
    Snyder JJ; Wiles JR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0115084. PubMed ID: 25629311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the Statistical Reasoning in Biology Concept Inventory (SRBCI).
    Deane T; Nomme K; Jeffery E; Pollock C; Birol G
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(1):ar5. PubMed ID: 26903497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making students do the thinking: team-based learning in a laboratory course.
    Simonson SR
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 24585470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nursing students' experiences with the use of authentic assessment rubric and case approach in the clinical laboratories.
    Wu XV; Heng MA; Wang W
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Apr; 35(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 25577674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opportunities for Self-Evaluation Increase Student Calibration in an Introductory Biology Course.
    Osterhage JL; Usher EL; Douin TA; Bailey WM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar16. PubMed ID: 31025916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.