These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26903657)

  • 1. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data.
    Dingus TA; Guo F; Lee S; Antin JF; Perez M; Buchanan-King M; Hankey J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(10):2636-41. PubMed ID: 26903657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using naturalistic driving data to explore the association between traffic safety-related events and crash risk at driver level.
    Wu KF; Aguero-Valverde J; Jovanis PP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():210-8. PubMed ID: 25086439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A synthetic approach to compare the large truck crash causation study and naturalistic driving data.
    Hickman JS; Hanowski RJ; Bocanegra J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Mar; 112():11-14. PubMed ID: 29306085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of crash rates and rear-end striking crashes among novice teens and experienced adults using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Seacrist T; Belwadi A; Prabahar A; Chamberlain S; Megariotis J; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():48-52. PubMed ID: 27586102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.
    McDonald CC; Curry AE; Kandadai V; Sommers MS; Winston FK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():302-8. PubMed ID: 25103321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.
    Guo F; Klauer SG; Fang Y; Hankey JM; Antin JF; Perez MA; Lee SE; Dingus TA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 28338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How dangerous is looking away from the road? Algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving.
    Liang Y; Lee JD; Yekhshatyan L
    Hum Factors; 2012 Dec; 54(6):1104-16. PubMed ID: 23397818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship of Near-Crash/Crash Risk to Time Spent on a Cell Phone While Driving.
    Farmer CM; Klauer SG; McClafferty JA; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):792-800. PubMed ID: 25793747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driver behavior analysis on rural 2-lane, 2-way highways using SHRP 2 NDS data.
    Wu J; Xu H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(8):838-843. PubMed ID: 30689397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade.
    Ferguson SA; Teoh ER; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2007; 38(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17478184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in older driver crash involvement rates and survivability in the United States: an update.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():44-54. PubMed ID: 25003969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A taxonomy of driving errors and violations: Evidence from the naturalistic driving study.
    Khattak AJ; Ahmad N; Wali B; Dumbaugh E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105873. PubMed ID: 33360090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study.
    Beanland V; Fitzharris M; Young KL; Lenné MG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 May; 54():99-107. PubMed ID: 23499981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring inattention and distraction in the SafetyNet Accident Causation Database.
    Talbot R; Fagerlind H; Morris A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():445-55. PubMed ID: 24176106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel approach for analyzing severe crash patterns on multilane highways.
    Pande A; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):985-94. PubMed ID: 19664436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative odds of involvement in seven crash configurations by driver age and sex.
    Bingham CR; Ehsani JP
    J Adolesc Health; 2012 Nov; 51(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 23084170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating the representativeness assumption of the quasi-induced exposure method using a national representative field observation survey.
    Shen S; Bao S; Zhu M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 33566705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quasi-induced exposure method: evaluation of not-at-fault assumption.
    Chandraratna S; Stamatiadis N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Mar; 41(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19245890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.