These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26904504)

  • 1. Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife.
    Liu H; Andrews DW; Evans JJ; Werner-Wasik M; Yu Y; Dicker AP; Shi W
    Front Oncol; 2016; 6():26. PubMed ID: 26904504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of plan quality and delivery time between volumetric arc therapy (RapidArc) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple cranial metastases.
    Thomas EM; Popple RA; Wu X; Clark GM; Markert JM; Guthrie BL; Yuan Y; Dobelbower MC; Spencer SA; Fiveash JB
    Neurosurgery; 2014 Oct; 75(4):409-17; discussion 417-8. PubMed ID: 24871143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of radiation dose spillage from the Gamma Knife Perfexion with that from volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery during treatment of multiple brain metastases in a single fraction.
    McDonald D; Schuler J; Takacs I; Peng J; Jenrette J; Vanek K
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl():51-9. PubMed ID: 25434937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric characterization of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery of large or complex brain tumors versus linear accelerator-based treatments.
    Dong P; Pérez-Andújar A; Pinnaduwage D; Braunstein S; Theodosopoulos P; McDermott M; Sneed P; Ma L
    J Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 125(Suppl 1):97-103. PubMed ID: 27903198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric Study of Automatic Brain Metastases Planning in Comparison with Conventional Multi-Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases.
    Mori Y; Kaneda N; Hagiwara M; Ishiguchi T
    Cureus; 2016 Nov; 8(11):e882. PubMed ID: 28003946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases.
    Han EY; Wang H; Luo D; Li J; Wang X
    J Neurosurg; 2020 May; 132(5):1473-1479. PubMed ID: 30952125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with TrueBeam LINAC and hypofractionated radiosurgery with gamma knife ICON for large (>10 cm3) skull base meningiomas.
    Saglam Y; Samanci Y; Bolukbasi Y; Peker S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1201-1211. PubMed ID: 36189527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator vs. Gamma Knife fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain tumors.
    Calugaru E; Whiting Z; Delacruz B; Ma D; Garcia B; Goenka A; Chang J
    Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36503990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics.
    Chea M; Fezzani K; Jacob J; Cuttat M; Croisé M; Simon JM; Feuvret L; Valery CA; Maingon P; Benadjaoud MA; Jenny C
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Feb; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 33639959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is there a volume threshold of brain metastases for Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy?
    Liu CW; Ahmed S; Gray T; Ma T; Cho YB; Neyman G; Chao S; Suh J; Xia P
    J Radiosurg SBRT; 2021; 7(4):309-319. PubMed ID: 34631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy vs. CyberKnife M6 for the Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases.
    El Shafie RA; Tonndorf-Martini E; Schmitt D; Celik A; Weber D; Lang K; König L; Höne S; Forster T; von Nettelbladt B; Adeberg S; Debus J; Rieken S; Bernhardt D
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():568. PubMed ID: 32457829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linac-based VMAT radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions: comparison between a conventional multi-isocenter approach and a new dedicated mono-isocenter technique.
    Ruggieri R; Naccarato S; Mazzola R; Ricchetti F; Corradini S; Fiorentino A; Alongi F
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Mar; 13(1):38. PubMed ID: 29506539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric Comparison, Treatment Efficiency Estimation, and Biological Evaluation of Popular Stereotactic Radiosurgery Options in Treating Single Small Brain Metastasis.
    Duan Y; Cao H; Wu B; Wu Y; Liu D; Zhou L; Feng A; Wang H; Chen H; Gu H; Shao Y; Huang Y; Lin Y; Ma K; Fu X; Fu H; Kong Q; Xu Z
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():716152. PubMed ID: 34540686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of single isocenter linear accelerator radiosurgery for metastases and base of skull lesions.
    Bossart E; Mellon EA; Monterroso I; Elsayyad N; Diwanji T; Samuels S; Dogan N
    Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():1-8. PubMed ID: 33278764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heuristic knowledge-based planning for single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery to multiple brain metastases.
    Ziemer BP; Sanghvi P; Hattangadi-Gluth J; Moore KL
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5001-5009. PubMed ID: 28731267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.
    Zhang S; Yang R; Wang X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):104-110. PubMed ID: 31580532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric Performance and Planning/Delivery Efficiency of a Dual-Layer Stacked and Staggered MLC on Treating Multiple Small Targets: A Planning Study Based on Single-Isocenter Multi-Target Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) to Brain Metastases.
    Li T; Irmen P; Liu H; Shi W; Alonso-Basanta M; Zou W; Teo BK; Metz JM; Dong L
    Front Oncol; 2019; 9():7. PubMed ID: 30723702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gamma Knife and volumetric modulated arc therapy stereotactic radiosurgery plan quality and OAR sparing comparison for pituitary adenomas and vestibular schwannomas.
    Balik S; Chao S; Neyman G
    J Radiosurg SBRT; 2018; 5(3):237-247. PubMed ID: 29988324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for cranial radiosurgery using multiple noncoplanar arcs.
    Audet C; Poffenbarger BA; Chang P; Jackson PS; Lundahl RE; Ryu SI; Ray GR
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):5863-72. PubMed ID: 22047350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison With Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife.
    Zhang S; Yang R; Shi C; Li J; Zhuang H; Tian S; Wang J
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819871621. PubMed ID: 31451059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.