292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26905018)
1. Erectile Function Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High Risk Features.
Recabal P; Assel M; Musser JE; Caras RJ; Sjoberg DD; Coleman JA; Mulhall JP; Parra RO; Scardino PT; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Laudone VP
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 26905018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Ward JF; Zincke H; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Blute ML
J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1328-32. PubMed ID: 15371834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recovery of Baseline Erectile Function in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Measures.
Sridhar AN; Cathcart PJ; Yap T; Hines J; Nathan S; Briggs TP; Kelly JD; Minhas S
J Sex Med; 2016 Mar; 13(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 26944466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy.
Rabbani F; Stapleton AM; Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1929-34. PubMed ID: 11061884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control. The controversy.
Walsh PC
Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Nov; 14(4):663-73. PubMed ID: 3314061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy using high anterior release of the levator fascia and constant haptic feedback in bilateral neurovascular bundle preservation plus early postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition: a contemporary series.
Hubanks JM; Umbreit EC; Karnes RJ; Myers RP
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):878-84. PubMed ID: 22154730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydrodissection of neurovascular bundles during open radical prostatectomy improves postoperative potency.
Patel MI; Spernat D; Lopez-Corona E
J Urol; 2011 Jul; 186(1):233-7. PubMed ID: 21575963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 prostate cancer.
Bigg SW; Kavoussi LR; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 1990 Dec; 144(6):1420-4. PubMed ID: 1700156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical safety and feasibility of a newly developed, simple algorithm for decision-making on neurovascular bundle preservation in radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Hisasue S; Masumori N; Kobayashi K; Kato R; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 40(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19959505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ko WJ; Truesdale MD; Hruby GW; Landman J; Badani KK
J Sex Med; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21426493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].
Jakse G; Brehmer B; Borchers H; Verger-Kuhnke A; Biesterfeld S
Urologe A; 2003 Mar; 42(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 12671772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles.
Quinlan DM; Epstein JI; Carter BS; Walsh PC
J Urol; 1991 May; 145(5):998-1002. PubMed ID: 2016818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.
Shin TY; Lee YS
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17595. PubMed ID: 33077779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy is quantitatively related to the response to intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation.
Rabbani F; Patel M; Cozzi P; Mulhall JP; Scardino PT
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19338540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
