292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26905018)
21. The Risks and Benefits of Cavernous Neurovascular Bundle Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Nguyen LN; Head L; Witiuk K; Punjani N; Mallick R; Cnossen S; Fergusson DA; Cagiannos I; Lavallée LT; Morash C; Breau RH
J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):760-769. PubMed ID: 28286069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Noh C; Kshirsagar A; Mohler JL
Urology; 2003 Feb; 61(2):412-6. PubMed ID: 12597958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Montorsi F; Salonia A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zanni G; Briganti A; Deho' F; Naspro R; Farina E; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 16257111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Neurovascular bundle size measured on 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging is associated with the recovery of erectile function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kwon T; Lee C; Jung J; Kim CS
Urol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):542.e11-542.e17. PubMed ID: 28648413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Bernstein AJ; Gofrit ON; Shikanov SA; Mikhail AA; Song DH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):1005-12. PubMed ID: 18419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Guru KA; Perlmutter AE; Butt ZM; Peabody JO
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):4000-3. PubMed ID: 18405449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.
Walz J; Epstein JI; Ganzer R; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Kaouk J; Menon M; Mottrie A; Myers RP; Patel V; Tewari A; Villers A; Artibani W
Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 26850969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Steiner MS
Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Preservation of erectile function in patients with prostatic cancer after radical prostatectomy].
Pushkar' DIu; Bormotin AV; Rasner PI
Urologiia; 2007; (1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17471990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.
Glickman L; Godoy G; Lepor H
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):731-5. PubMed ID: 19091349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recent neuroanatomical studies on the neurovascular bundle of the prostate and cavernosal nerves: clinical reflections on radical prostatectomy.
Yucel S; Erdogru T; Baykara M
Asian J Androl; 2005 Dec; 7(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 16281080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study.
Fromont G; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Validire P; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1843-6. PubMed ID: 14532789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predictors of recovery of erectile function after unilateral cavernous nerve graft reconstruction at radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Rabbani F; Ramasamy R; Patel MI; Cozzi P; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Mehrara BJ; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Mulhall JP
J Sex Med; 2010 Jan; 7(1 Pt 1):166-81. PubMed ID: 19686422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases.
Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Cathala N; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):908-11. PubMed ID: 16093985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy with preservation of potency. Results using a new nerve-sparing technique.
Walsh PC; Mostwin JL
Br J Urol; 1984 Dec; 56(6):694-7. PubMed ID: 6534493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
