These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26905502)

  • 1. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. English-learning infants developing sensitivity to vowel phonotactic cues to word segmentation.
    Katsuda H; Sundara M
    Dev Sci; 2024 Nov; 27(6):e13564. PubMed ID: 39230987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning about sounds contributes to learning about words: effects of prosody and phonotactics on infant word learning.
    Graf Estes K; Bowen S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Mar; 114(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 23177349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning builds on learning: infants' use of native language sound patterns to learn words.
    Graf Estes K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():313-27. PubMed ID: 24980741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listeners learn phonotactic patterns conditioned on suprasegmental cues.
    White KS; Chambers KE; Miller Z; Jethava V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2560-2576. PubMed ID: 27734753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A "bat" is easier to learn than a "tab": effects of relative phonotactic frequency on infant word learning.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Poltrock S; Nazzi T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59601. PubMed ID: 23527227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants.
    Mattys SL; Jusczyk PW
    Cognition; 2001 Feb; 78(2):91-121. PubMed ID: 11074247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between statistical and semantic information in infant language development.
    Lany J; Saffran JR
    Dev Sci; 2011 Sep; 14(5):1207-19. PubMed ID: 21884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonotactic constraints on infant word learning.
    Graf Estes K; Edwards J; Saffran JR
    Infancy; 2011; 16(2):180-197. PubMed ID: 21297877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Categorical phonotactic knowledge filters second language input, but probabilistic phonotactic knowledge can still be acquired.
    Lentz TO; Kager RW
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):387-413. PubMed ID: 26529903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-adjacent consonant sequence patterns in English target words during the first-word period.
    Aoyama K; Davis BL
    J Child Lang; 2017 Sep; 44(5):1065-1087. PubMed ID: 27523171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss.
    Stiles DJ; McGregor KK; Bentler RA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 12-month-olds' phonotactic knowledge guides their word-object mappings.
    MacKenzie H; Curtin S; Graham SA
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(4):1129-36. PubMed ID: 22537246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological Learning Influences Label-Object Mapping in Toddlers.
    Breen E; Pomper R; Saffran J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1923-1932. PubMed ID: 31170356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-adjacent dependency learning in infancy, and its link to language development.
    Frost RLA; Jessop A; Durrant S; Peter MS; Bidgood A; Pine JM; Rowland CF; Monaghan P
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Aug; 120():101291. PubMed ID: 32197131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy.
    Lew-Williams C; Pelucchi B; Saffran JR
    Dev Sci; 2011 Nov; 14(6):1323-9. PubMed ID: 22010892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation.
    Blanchard D; Heinz J; Golinkoff R
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):487-511. PubMed ID: 20307346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the "anchor word" effect in infants: Segmentation and categorisation of speech with and without high frequency words.
    Frost RLA; Dunn K; Christiansen MH; Gómez RL; Monaghan P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243436. PubMed ID: 33332419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception.
    Friederici AD; Wessels JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 8414887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.