212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26905502)
1. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning about sounds contributes to learning about words: effects of prosody and phonotactics on infant word learning.
Graf Estes K; Bowen S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Mar; 114(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 23177349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning builds on learning: infants' use of native language sound patterns to learn words.
Graf Estes K
J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():313-27. PubMed ID: 24980741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Listeners learn phonotactic patterns conditioned on suprasegmental cues.
White KS; Chambers KE; Miller Z; Jethava V
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2560-2576. PubMed ID: 27734753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A "bat" is easier to learn than a "tab": effects of relative phonotactic frequency on infant word learning.
Gonzalez-Gomez N; Poltrock S; Nazzi T
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59601. PubMed ID: 23527227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants.
Mattys SL; Jusczyk PW
Cognition; 2001 Feb; 78(2):91-121. PubMed ID: 11074247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interactions between statistical and semantic information in infant language development.
Lany J; Saffran JR
Dev Sci; 2011 Sep; 14(5):1207-19. PubMed ID: 21884336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phonotactic constraints on infant word learning.
Graf Estes K; Edwards J; Saffran JR
Infancy; 2011; 16(2):180-197. PubMed ID: 21297877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Categorical phonotactic knowledge filters second language input, but probabilistic phonotactic knowledge can still be acquired.
Lentz TO; Kager RW
Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):387-413. PubMed ID: 26529903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-adjacent consonant sequence patterns in English target words during the first-word period.
Aoyama K; Davis BL
J Child Lang; 2017 Sep; 44(5):1065-1087. PubMed ID: 27523171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss.
Stiles DJ; McGregor KK; Bentler RA
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 23472959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 12-month-olds' phonotactic knowledge guides their word-object mappings.
MacKenzie H; Curtin S; Graham SA
Child Dev; 2012; 83(4):1129-36. PubMed ID: 22537246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phonological Learning Influences Label-Object Mapping in Toddlers.
Breen E; Pomper R; Saffran J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1923-1932. PubMed ID: 31170356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-adjacent dependency learning in infancy, and its link to language development.
Frost RLA; Jessop A; Durrant S; Peter MS; Bidgood A; Pine JM; Rowland CF; Monaghan P
Cogn Psychol; 2020 Aug; 120():101291. PubMed ID: 32197131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy.
Lew-Williams C; Pelucchi B; Saffran JR
Dev Sci; 2011 Nov; 14(6):1323-9. PubMed ID: 22010892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation.
Blanchard D; Heinz J; Golinkoff R
J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):487-511. PubMed ID: 20307346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the "anchor word" effect in infants: Segmentation and categorisation of speech with and without high frequency words.
Frost RLA; Dunn K; Christiansen MH; Gómez RL; Monaghan P
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243436. PubMed ID: 33332419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception.
Friederici AD; Wessels JM
Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 8414887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Hoover JR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
