478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26905531)
1. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
Grant KW; Walden TC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recognition performance for four combinations of FM system and hearing aid microphone signals in adverse listening conditions.
Pittman AL; Lewis DE; Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG
Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10466564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
Thibodeau LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the Influence of Acoustic Coupling of Hearing Aids on FM Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Norrix LW; Van Tasell D; Ross J; Harris FP; Dean J
Am J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 24(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 25651525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a BICROS System with a Directional Microphone in the Receiver and Transmitter.
Valente M; Oeding K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):856-71. PubMed ID: 26554490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing individual variation in perceptual directional microphone benefit.
Keidser G; Dillon H; Convery E; Mejia J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):955-68. PubMed ID: 24384081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
Luts H; Maj JB; Soede W; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
Ledda KT; Valente M; Oeding K; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
