BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26905732)

  • 1. Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Smartphone Inclinometer Application to Quantify Cervical Spine Mobility.
    Guidetti L; Placentino U; Baldari C
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1359-E1366. PubMed ID: 26905732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent validity and interrater reliability of a new smartphone application to assess 3D active cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain.
    Stenneberg MS; Busstra H; Eskes M; van Trijffel E; Cattrysse E; Scholten-Peeters GGM; de Bie RA
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2018 Apr; 34():59-65. PubMed ID: 29328979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new iPhone application for measuring active craniocervical range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain: a reliability and validity study.
    Pourahmadi MR; Bagheri R; Taghipour M; Takamjani IE; Sarrafzadeh J; Mohseni-Bandpei MA
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 28890223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® application for measuring active lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion in patients with low back pain.
    Pourahmadi M; Momeni E; Mohseni N; Hesarikia H; Ghanjal A; Shamsoddini A
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2021 Jan; 37(1):204-217. PubMed ID: 31081417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and Intrarater Reliability Using a Smartphone Clinometer Application to Measure Active Cervical Range of Motion Including Rotation Measurements in Supine.
    Monreal C; Luinstra L; Larkins L; May J
    J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Sep; 30(4):680-684. PubMed ID: 32932236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smartphone Inclinometry Is a Valid and Reliable Tool for Measuring Frontal Plane Tibial Alignment in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Knees.
    Tse CTF; Charlton JM; Lam J; Ho J; Bears J; Serek A; Hunt MA
    Phys Ther; 2021 Jul; 101(7):. PubMed ID: 33710269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants.
    Tousignant-Laflamme Y; Boutin N; Dion AM; Vallée CA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jul; 10(1):69. PubMed ID: 23829201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and Validity of Cervical Range of Motion and Muscle Strength Testing.
    Kubas C; Chen YW; Echeverri S; McCann SL; Denhoed MJ; Walker CJ; Kennedy CN; Reid WD
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1087-1096. PubMed ID: 27467513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability, minimal detectable change and concurrent validity of a gravity-based bubble inclinometer and iphone application for measuring standing lumbar lordosis.
    Salamh PA; Kolber M
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2014 Jan; 30(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 23862655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and concurrent validity of a Smartphone, bubble inclinometer and motion analysis system for measurement of hip joint range of motion.
    Charlton PC; Mentiplay BF; Pua YH; Clark RA
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 May; 18(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 24831757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device.
    Audette I; Dumas JP; Côté JN; De Serres SJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 20436238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and Reliability of 2 Goniometric Mobile Apps: Device, Application, and Examiner Factors.
    Wellmon RH; Gulick DT; Paterson ML; Gulick CN
    J Sport Rehabil; 2016 Dec; 25(4):371-379. PubMed ID: 27632853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of an iPhone(®) application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion.
    Pourahmadi MR; Taghipour M; Jannati E; Mohseni-Bandpei MA; Ebrahimi Takamjani I; Rajabzadeh F
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2355. PubMed ID: 27635328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normal functional range of motion of the cervical spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20051924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of two Smartphone applications to measure the lower and upper cervical spine range of motion in subjects with chronic cervical pain.
    Rodríguez-Sanz J; Carrasco-Uribarren A; Cabanillas-Barea S; Hidalgo-García C; Fanlo-Mazas P; Lucha-López MO; Tricás-Moreno JM
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2019; 32(4):619-627. PubMed ID: 30614791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and criterion validity of the "Gyroscope" application of the iPod™ for measuring lumbar range of motion.
    Boudreau N; Brochu FO; Dubreuil LM; Laurendeau T; Leblanc O; De Vette E; Tousignant-Laflamme Y
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 31658035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and intra-rater reliability of an android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion.
    Quek J; Brauer SG; Treleaven J; Pua YH; Mentiplay B; Clark RA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 11():65. PubMed ID: 24742001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography-based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics.
    Dvir Z; Prushansky T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Nov; 15(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 10946098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and concurrent validity of a mobile application to measure thoracolumbar range of motion in low back pain patients.
    de Brito Macedo L; Borges DT; Melo SA; da Costa KSA; de Oliveira Sousa C; Brasileiro JS
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 31127756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Zebris versus Myrin: a comparative study between a three-dimensional ultrasound movement analysis and an inclinometer/compass method: intradevice reliability, concurrent validity, intertester comparison, intratester reliability, and intraindividual variability.
    Malmström EM; Karlberg M; Melander A; Magnusson M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(21):E433-40. PubMed ID: 14595170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.